FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I miss gv (ghostview) for reading postscript eps files.
Since FC4 gv has been excluded.
Does somebody have an rpm for gv ? I tried to build from source without success.
The others: evince , ggv , kview wouldn't allow me to set page size at runtime.
I need to edit the bounding box by hand to display in A4.
And they are slower than gv.
However, it is almost certain that it will also work on your system as a) FC is derived from RH, and b) the version of RH in the link is older than that of FC4.
the rpm doesn't work mj, it complains about dependencies.
the gv source also didn't compile - maybe due to the new gcc version in FC4.
but, fortunately, there is gsview, in FC4 extra that seems as good as gv - so my feeling seems to have been happy again.
the rpm doesn't work mj, it complains about dependencies.
the gv source also didn't compile - maybe due to the new gcc version in FC4
This doesn't seem too out of the ordinary -- the usual procedure would simply be to install the missing packages at the same time, or upgrade gcc (this latter one wouldn't normally halt a compilation -- normally it would simply be a missing library that needed installation).
Anyway, great to hear that you have something working
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.