| Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
12-19-2003, 10:24 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Distribution: Fedora core
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Fedora very slow.....
Hello,
Just installed my first linux os, just because I was curious. I know the machine I installed on does not perfectly fit the requirements, but its the only spare machine I have. Its an AMD K62 350mhz, 256mb pc100sdram, Diamond viper 550, 5gb hdd. Built it in 98.
Installed Fedora, and for some reason its very, very slow. Opening Mozilla, from the click to the window being open takes approximately 5 minutes. A little on the ridiculous side.
I checked system resources, and found that with nothing open, 240mb of memory is used. Is this normal? Are there any processes that I can terminate to free up memory? Or do I just need to install on a pentium based system?
Thanx in advance,
Tod
|
|
|
|
12-19-2003, 11:59 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico City
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu & Mint
Posts: 1,679
Rep:
|
The system will always cache to memory as much data as possible to have it readily available. The problem (the way I see it) is that you have a very limited processor for the GUI FC1 has (GNOME 2.4 & KDE 3.1) you could overcome this problem with a light weight GUI like fluxbox, blackbox, Xface or ICE. It would be comparable to running WinXP on a 450-500 Mhz machine...
Last edited by Thetargos; 12-20-2003 at 12:01 AM.
|
|
|
|
12-23-2003, 07:02 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 1
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Not agree, I am jsut runing a K6 - 233Mhz (not K6-2) with only 128Mb ram under Gnome dafult GUI and Mozilla takes just 4 seconds to be ready.
Something else must be happening in your system.
F.
|
|
|
|
12-24-2003, 04:48 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Diawang-awangan
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary!
Posts: 319
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ferossandon
Not agree, I am jsut runing a K6 - 233Mhz (not K6-2) with only 128Mb ram under Gnome dafult GUI and Mozilla takes just 4 seconds to be ready.
Something else must be happening in your system.
F.
|
You kidding me .. even my AMD Athlon 1700+ with 768MB RAM takes more than 30 seconds to be ready. Oh yes, I do have network card and some other services running.
|
|
|
|
12-24-2003, 09:51 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,104
Rep:
|
As Thetargos mentioned - use a lighter WM - and yes, there's probably lots of uneeded services - after a quick Google for descriptions - in an xterm, su to Root user with
su -
(su with a space then a dash)
root password
then
chkconfig --list | grep 5:on
to see which services are set to start in graphical mode - and then to stop a service from starting ( for example)
chkconfig httpd off
|
|
|
|
12-24-2003, 04:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: primarily Red Hat
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
It shouldn't be *that* slow! I have an AMD K6-2 350 w/ 256 MB RAM also. Opening Mozilla is slower than it was before I upgraded to Fedora, but I haven't bothered troubleshooting (it could just be the new GUI.) I haven't timed it, but I'm sure it's less than one minute to load.
I was just about to append a complaint about slow menus, but I see that is no longer a problem.
So instead of "me too" I ask what kernel you are running? I just noticed I wasn't running the latest kernel I had installed (which I now realize isn't even the latest) so I rebooted. It's much faster now!
Old: kernel-2.4.22-1.2115.nptl
Current: kernel-2.4.22-1.2129.nptl
Next: kernel-2.4.22-1.2135
|
|
|
|
12-24-2003, 05:44 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Diawang-awangan
Distribution: Ubuntu Hoary!
Posts: 319
Rep:
|
Opss.. I guess I misunderstood the 2nd poster .. firing Mozilla surely takes less than 4 secs .. was talking about from booting up until the desktop is ready may take more than 30 secs.
|
|
|
|
12-28-2003, 05:42 PM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 1
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Tod:
I have seen this happen when networking is not configured correctly... everything takes forever to load (not just Mozilla as you have mentioned)... I can't remember exactly what was my problem, but I think it was either my gateway or dns was not configured correctly.
Good luck.
James.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2003, 09:53 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Distribution: RHEL, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 1,418
Rep:
|
It's the hostname setting, and I haven't found a way around it.
Changing the hostname to anything but localhost.localdomain killed gnome for my fedora setup, and I couldn't really find a way around it.
Even adding the IP (booth loopback at 127.0.0.1 or my real IP) to the resolv.conf file didn't fix it.
Strange problem, because I Hated seeing "user@localhost" in the prompt and not being able to change localhost the normal way without my gui being all whacked out !
-Shade
|
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 06:01 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Georgia, US
Distribution: RHEL WS4
Posts: 189
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Shade
It's the hostname setting, and I haven't found a way around it.
Changing the hostname to anything but localhost.localdomain killed gnome for my fedora setup, and I couldn't really find a way around it.
Even adding the IP (booth loopback at 127.0.0.1 or my real IP) to the resolv.conf file didn't fix it.
Strange problem, because I Hated seeing "user@localhost" in the prompt and not being able to change localhost the normal way without my gui being all whacked out !
-Shade
|
You don't want to replace the localhost.localdomain entry in host that will cause you all kinds of problems as you've found out
Just add a new host name after localhost.localdomain like so...
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdoman <newhostname>
You can then set your hostname to <newhostname> and all prompts etc.. that use hostname will use your new host name.
|
|
|
|
01-09-2004, 05:07 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: England
Distribution: Lubuntu, Bodhi, Puppy,
Posts: 85
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Just installed my first linux os, just because I was curious.
|
Distro's like Fedora are easier to install. When you get the hang of linux a bit try Slackware. It runs really well on slower machines (like my P2 400Mhz). At the mo I have Fedora on my faster machine & Slack on the slower one.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2004, 03:06 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Pinr Lake, GA
Distribution: Slackware, LinuxMint, FreeBSD, Xandros, CentOS, Fedora Core, RedHat, Chakra, etc etc
Posts: 215
Rep:
|
Just multi-partition on your primary pc and try Linux on that. Also be sure to check your DMA settings. If Fedora set everything to PIO mode that would explain why its running slow. Did you install everything? that would mean your HD is almost full which would also limit performance. Did you automatically partition? reinstall and repartion and be sure to use at least 500MB for a swap. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
01-10-2004, 03:09 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Pinr Lake, GA
Distribution: Slackware, LinuxMint, FreeBSD, Xandros, CentOS, Fedora Core, RedHat, Chakra, etc etc
Posts: 215
Rep:
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|