LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-25-2006, 06:39 AM   #1
WhatsOnYourBrain
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 15
Fedora Core 5 - You mean i get all this?


hi. i'm not yet a Linux user but i've been wanting to install it-- as soon as i get a video card for this extra box i've got here-- and more memory, unless 128 megs will run it (figure i probably want at least 256 in there, right?). if anyone thinks i can get by w/ 128-- for learning/ starting out/ basic php n mysql stuff, i might give 'er a go sooner! (sorry for the long intro there)

okay-- i found this nice little 'slideshow' which demos the fedora core 5 installation. i honestly had no idea that linux was this graphical. i mean, i assumed there was a graphical desktop & 3rd party apps-- i thought, at least at the install-- i'd probably be dealing w/ 'command line' stuff (which is fine, of course)... considering that i see so much ".. note: if you're on linux, you'll type instead usr/bin/..." when i'm working, for example, on a software walkthru which is common to both win and Linux.

it must be a common misconception?
I've been using LitesStep for windows-- the alternative shell. when i was surveying the Fedora desktop, i realized-- "litestep... it's a linux emulation!?". anyone familiar w/ that? i gotta tell ya, i'm really diggin' litestep, so perhaps i'll be more prepared for Linux than i thought?

thanks for reading! i look forward to your replies.
 
Old 05-25-2006, 06:55 AM   #2
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
I would urge you to get 512 megs of ram if you want to run a desktop environment. It just makes the experience a bit smoother. I managed to run GNOME (The default Fedora Core DE) on 128 megs of ram but things were a bit sluggish. For a graphics card, I suggest you get Nvidia based cards, because their linux drivers are really good.

Linux can be both very "graphical" or strictly command line based depending on the distro and how you set it up. There are many situations where using the command line would be faster than using a gui or a specific task would be impossible to perform in a gui so at some point you may have to use the CLI. From your post it doesn't seem like you will struggle since you already have some experience with the CLI.

Last edited by reddazz; 05-25-2006 at 06:56 AM.
 
Old 05-25-2006, 08:45 AM   #3
ride153
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Northeast USA
Distribution: current is PCLOS (server) and Suse (desktop)
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: 15
this http://www.xfce.org/ could save some mem and cpu usage, its also included on the install cds
 
Old 05-30-2006, 01:21 PM   #4
WhatsOnYourBrain
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
edit:
after much frustration trying to install mysql5.x on my XP system to work on localhost along w/ php5.1.x and apache2.0.54, i decided to wipe an extra drive in preparation for linux. i'm tired of fooling around!
so, now using my 'main system', i'll have 768 RAM to work with, and no need for the vid card, etc (although, i'd still like to ultimately hook up that system as a Linux box as described earlier-- but something tells me that i may not be on Windows much once i get this going...)

i'm proud to say that i downloaded the 5-CD iso i386 Fedora Core 5 this afternoon. i haven't moved forward w/ it yet, but as soon as i get home from work, baby, i'm ready to rock!

any last bits of advice before i begin the metamorphosis?

Last edited by WhatsOnYourBrain; 05-30-2006 at 01:27 PM.
 
Old 05-31-2006, 04:16 AM   #5
BobNutfield
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Fedora , Ubuntu, Slackware-Current
Posts: 1,477

Rep: Reputation: 51
While Fedora is one of the more intuitive distros around, it can still take some tweaking to get it where you want it. It can be a little frustrating sometimes. But, donŽt give in to frustration, and since you seem to have considerable experience, I doubt if you will.

IŽll say this: if you are not a prolific gamer, once you get linux set up, I doubt if you will ever need/want to boot into Windows again.

Bob
 
Old 06-02-2006, 12:44 PM   #6
WhatsOnYourBrain
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
yeah, i'm definitely not a gamer. i am having a bit of trouble w/ apache though. but before i explain that, let me just say that my intent for linux was to obtain for myself a better web development environment. i'm into the php side of things (mysql, postgresql, etc), web standards (i.e. no flash) and just about anything else that's related to that-- i'm also a 'hosting provider' for my clients, but of course i'm doing that through another provider.

okay-- the apache thing. i configured httpd.conf, tweaked it to how i 'know' it to be tweaked from my previous experience and from what i know about Linux (i.e. of course i didn't use documentroot c:\apache\htdocs ... , but you know what i mean). when i pull up localhost in my browser, i get the standard non-fancy directory listing (w/ one file in there, i see one file named 'test.html' which i created in text editor- very simple just saying hello or something in an h1 element), but when i click on the file, all i get is a blank screen! i've never seen anything like it-- except maybe when php is stuck in a loop or something w/out an error shown. any ideas?

(i hope this isn't a cross-post... i've posted so many places w/ this issue... everyone just keeps sending me to the cure-all at stanton-finley.net... which isn't helping, of course)
 
  


Reply

Tags
apache, fedora, httpd, i386, installation, iso, localhost, server


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Upgrade Fedora Core 4 (FC4) to Fedora Core 5 (FC5) hangs vogelap Fedora - Installation 10 05-22-2006 09:00 AM
can fedora core 4 be upgraded to fedora core 5 without a full reinstall lcornea Linux - Software 2 05-10-2006 07:58 AM
Severe problems with Fedora Core 1 and Fedora Core 2 installatiom TheOneKEA Fedora - Installation 2 07-14-2004 02:12 PM
Fedora Core 2 - Just days away! Final comments on Fedora Core 1 lrt2003 Fedora 3 05-12-2004 02:09 AM
Will Fedora Core 1 RPMs still be compatable with Fedora Core 2? yarjar Linux - Software 1 05-02-2004 01:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration