FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is FC5 stable? does it have mysql 5 and php 5 with fulfilling all dependencies to work on both?? And does it have any bandwidth throttoling for apache? What is the major improvement of it except the kernal?
depends what stable means to you. fedora is a developement distribution. it's sole point of existing is to make mistakes and test stuff so that redhat don't have to do it themselves in a commerical environment. from that perspective fedora is *never* stable.
Great... then RH Ent?? right?? RH8 is said stable by a admin in jy country. Is RH9 better than RH8?? or RH8 is best?? Actually i dont have enough money to buy soft. I need solution... it is for a non profitable project... www.banglardamal.org
I hapen to be typeing this responce on a machine which runs fc6 zod just fine and dandy. I have nothing but praise to bestowe upon red had and the fedora core team. I think read hat hasa much better understanding of what the term open sorucce means than Novel who owns Suse. In fact, I would highly recommend redhat Fedora Core to any body who asked me which distibution to use.
there is a time and place for fedora, and the enterprise is not it. blindly recommending a single distribution across the board is dangerous. fedora is a developement distribution. it's *meant* to not work...
If you want stable and free, have a look at centos, that's what it claims to be.
I'm only a home user so can't be of much use to you, but others speak highly of it.
I am running servers for Database, web, ftp, dns, etc. So i need stable... but since the project is a loss project, need the soft free. but stable.... so ?? And which FC has mysql 5 and php 5 built in given??
so;... CentOS, *IF* you wish to have something as similar to Fedora as possible without a charge, but there are other alternatives. recommending distributions should not disintegrate into a popularity contest, and i'm recommending CentOS here due to it's extremely close relationship to Fedora. other server OS's are available...
Thanks... and if i need to use fedora, then in which version i can get it with mysql 5 and php5??
Is debian good for DNS?? or best?? I found RH's bind9 has a major problem with RNDC. And i tried to solve it but finally someone here told me that it is a bug of it. So Debian is good?? and free from RNDC bug???
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.