FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I made a clean install of Fedora Core 4 and I found that the Red Hat Notification Icon is always ok. If run up2date, I find that there are pending updates. It's a bug on the RHN Alert icon? anyone is having the same problem?
Not really an issue, I use yum, and and chek updates frecuently.. but its nice to have things working the way they should.
I'm having similar problems, and it is bugging me.
I use yum to update the system normally, but i liked it when the icon switched to an exclamation point so i knew to run "yum update", but now this is not possible, as even if there are updates available it stays a blue checkmark. BUt if i launch up2date manually, updates are listed.
I believe that you could include all the rest of your YUM repos there, and haave then all checked.
I'm not very familiar with Fedora (played with FC3 a little, and just installed FC4 to try it out) but from the comments in the default /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources file it appears that the "repomd" line makes up2date look in /etc/yum.repos.d/ which implies to me that it _is_ using yum. Am I wrong?
What's more, I'm not sure this explains the problem with the notification icon. In my case at least, up2date can see that there are updates, same as yum (though it complains that they are not signed) but the RHN icon stays blue.
Anyone know if there's a fix for the icon yet? It's useful to know that there are updates waiting, whatever method (yum or up2date) is used to load them.
I beg to differ. I've already seen that article and applied that fix, which fixes up2date - but not the notification icon. I believe that they are two different things - as demonstrated by the fact that they are sometimes out of sync (something I noticed with FC3 and have seen mentioned elsewhere).
Essentially, fedora core 4 uses a modified version of up2date which supports the new yum(having the repos as files in a folder instead of just one big file) and it works quite well. However, the rhn applet has NOT been changed, and does not support the new yum.
This is at the bottom of the Fedora News Article posted by javaroast:
"Sorry, I still haven't found a fix for rhn-applet issue yet but it's been already reported in bugzilla so an updated rhn-applet should be released from Fedora Project soon. Until then, please keep monitoring Fedora Core 4 Updates page and use *yum* to receive updates on FC4." --Thomas Chung
Additionally, Up-2-date uses the yum repos to update.
I just installed FC4 today (in a "testing" partition - I'm not quite ready to upgrade my live FC3 system just yet....)
Up2date works for me (sort of) - though not the applet. However when the packages come down it appears that they are NOT signed with the GPG key. Should I be concerned about this - or just download anyway?