LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2005, 09:58 AM   #1
hkl8324
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 234

Rep: Reputation: 30
Compare to other linux distro, fedora runs freaking slow.....


why RH linux run so slow?

When i move a window, it leaves trail...

i can always hear my CPU fan spinning (i am using laptop)

it eat at least 260MB of ram while other distro only eat 230 or something....

RH's linuxs are so bloated...i think RH dev should tweak the so to run faster...
 
Old 07-03-2005, 10:10 AM   #2
ingvildr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: England, South East
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 30
everyone has different hardware, i have heard some people say core 4 is quite fast, maybe it just doesn't play well with what you have.
 
Old 07-03-2005, 11:19 AM   #3
deardron
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Russia/Iceland
Distribution: Ubuntu 6, NetBSD 3.1, Cygwin
Posts: 39

Rep: Reputation: 15
I've been using RH8, RH9, FC2 and FC3 - all of them have been noticeably slow, much slower than Win98 or Win2000.
 
Old 07-03-2005, 02:26 PM   #4
es7us
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: ubuntu 6.06, openSuSE 10.0, Mandriva 2007
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
yeah, FC4 seems a little slow also (as compared to Windows XP on the same hardware). However, XP crashed multiple times and eventually would not boot at all - hence my install of Linux.

I originally installed Debian Sarge, which seemed to be about the same as FC4 in terms of speed.

all that said, I do have a fair amount of graphical stuff running (stuff that XP simply does not have) - I'm sure it would be much faster if I trimmed it down.
 
Old 07-06-2005, 06:16 PM   #5
hob
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 1,075

Rep: Reputation: 45
XP is the actually most "snappy" OS around - it's been optimised for responsiveness, much more so than OS X or Linux.

Fedora may be slightly slower than some other distributions on older hardware due to the demands of security features such SELinux. It shouldn't use 260Mb RAM unless you have multiple applications going, though. The best option for the OP is probably to use System Monitor to find where the memory is going, as command-line utilities like top may not give accurate results with graphical applications.
 
Old 07-06-2005, 06:31 PM   #6
es7us
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: ubuntu 6.06, openSuSE 10.0, Mandriva 2007
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
I am also running a bunch of server software, that has to eat up some CPU. I'm sure the workstation version of FC4 is snappier, but maybe still slower than XP.
 
Old 07-06-2005, 07:04 PM   #7
hob
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Wales, UK
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 1,075

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally posted by es7us
I am also running a bunch of server software, that has to eat up some CPU. I'm sure the workstation version of FC4 is snappier, but maybe still slower than XP.
The "workstation" and "server" installation options actually just affect which software packages are installed. It's worth running System Monitor or the 'top' utility to get a feel for how Linux runs - you'll notice that your CPU does almost nothing most of the time, but Linux has lots of processes going on to support the graphical desktop all chewing memory, and much more of it than the server processes do. Once you are past the break even-point where Linux has enough memory it will use some of the excess to cache, which makes the system feel more responsive. My workstation is quite old, but with 768MB RAM Fedora whizzes even with VMWare and a bunch of network services. In contrast I have a laptop with 128MB RAM which struggles once you load more than a couple of applications.
 
Old 07-06-2005, 11:56 PM   #8
es7us
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: ubuntu 6.06, openSuSE 10.0, Mandriva 2007
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 16
yeah, I figured the graphical stuff made more of an impact, but I thought the other services were worth mentioning.
 
Old 07-07-2005, 12:13 AM   #9
mkoljack
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 4, Suse 9.3
Posts: 186

Rep: Reputation: 30
I understand when things are not working quite right on your own system, but I think your situation should be researched to see what the issues are causing the problem. My experience is the same as the following review:

"The most noticeable improvement when you boot-up FC4 is how much faster the process is. It took only 55 seconds to get from the GRUB boot menu to the graphical login screen, compared to a minute 40 seconds in Fedora Core 3. GNOME’s startup time was a mere 16 seconds, down from 27 seconds in FC3. I found most applications to be more responsive, startup times for OpenOffice.org, Firefox and Thunderbird have improved quite a bit."

-- Technetra Review of Fedora Core 4

Full Review:
http://www.technetra.com/writings/re...ora_core4_html

Last edited by mkoljack; 07-07-2005 at 12:15 AM.
 
Old 07-07-2005, 02:44 AM   #10
Michael Johnson
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Wagga Wagga, Australia
Posts: 262

Rep: Reputation: 30
If you are running a lot of services you don't need you can get a speedup by stopping the services you don't use. FC is usually compiled to a lower level processor than say mandrake or a gentoo. This will affect the speed also as it does not use those later processor instructions that allow the later processor to run code faster.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux 9.2 runs very slow on 233MHz PC Kachaturian Suse/Novell 24 01-22-2005 07:39 PM
[Fedora Core 2]Enemy Territory displays error while installing and runs too slow. Harkov Linux - Software 3 07-05-2004 06:07 AM
linux runs slow! pyre Linux - Newbie 10 06-03-2004 10:39 PM
Why GUI runs slow on linux? jitus Linux - Newbie 4 03-18-2004 01:43 PM
Why application on linux running slow compare on Windows? garyura Linux - General 15 08-28-2002 05:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration