DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I have it up and running here with debian testing. This will be released soon. I was quite insecure, if I should stay with ext3 or format a new hard disc to ext4, if there could be any drawbacks. Reason for ext4 to me is the large size of new hard discs, so I don't want to wait for ages until a fsck ist over. In comparison boot time increases from 58s to 46s on the same hardware with quite the same os (future debian 6 "squeeze"). This is an increase of 20% roughly - on a PC that is 5 years old now! Grub2 needed some additional support for ext4 afaik. I have ext4 in use for /-partition and /home-partition.
Distribution: Slackware (mainly) and then a lot of others...
I know that debian is something that has many applications and projects working on it and ext4 seems to be stable at this point in time so I do not see any reason why ext4 should not be included in the debian default. If slackware says ext4 is stable then it is. With everything migrating to ext4 I do not think debian has a chance to deny ext4 in the next release.
Not intending to derail the thread here, but would ext4 offer any major improvements over ext3 for a laptop/desktop user? I toyed with the idea of using ext4 when I installed squeeze, but decided to stick with ext3.