Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-23-2005, 05:04 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Israel
Distribution: Debian 3.1 Sarge, Ubuntu Breezy
Posts: 223
Rep:
|
Why - bleeding edge SW
I see that lots of people run after bleeding edge SW. I can see that Ubuntu release takes most recent packages only few weeks after they had been released.
I remember I've taken testing CD set and there was Gnome 2.6 after few weeks I wanted to add some CDs and had to download later CDs - and so I had to upgrade to Gnome 2.8... And I've asked myself - what is the difference!!!!!! I allmost can't find?
Why do you prefere to take a risk and upgrade versions to latest version when you have stable working system... What do you gain?
Is it reasonable to take 2.10 Gnome and KDE 3.4 when they are not stable enough? Even desktop system have to work smoothly.
|
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 05:22 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, RHEL, Slack
Posts: 1,555
Rep:
|
because its fun to break and fix it
<edit>
PS: I have no life
|
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 05:30 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: far enough
Distribution: OS X 10.6.7
Posts: 1,690
Rep:
|
If you don't put the latest which could be the greatest some people will complain. If you put the latest which is still buggy, guys will still complain anyway.
Some can't stand not running up2date software, let'em be and enjoy the stability of your software/distro. Some distros do care about their users.
Running the unstable branch of Debian is a choice and one has to accept the consequences and the meaning of that.
If ubuntu is stable enough i guess it is ok!
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 05:34 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia, QLD
Distribution: Redhat, Fedora, Debian, Windoze 2K, any other distro I get my hands on :)
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
some people like running the latest version of an application because it might have better support for there configuration or they are like musicman_ace and like trying to break software. 
|
|
|
|
05-23-2005, 07:28 AM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 11,223
|
Testers are always needed - them what live on the edge do everyone a service.
|
|
|
|
05-24-2005, 12:40 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: lake michigan
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 456
Rep:
|
if your not a tester or file dont file bug reports...don't know. Productivity is kind of boring to talk about in irc I guess.

|
|
|
|
05-24-2005, 01:16 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,732
|
Quote:
Originally posted by musicman_ace
because its fun to break and fix it 
<edit>
PS: I have no life
|
Thats the fun of running Sid.  I find with apt-listbugs I have very few issues. The only problem I have run into so far was trying to use Enlightenment for some reason it doesn't like me. Gnome and KDE both work fine. I am one of those people that installs and uninstalls packages on an almost daily basis.
|
|
|
|
05-24-2005, 11:27 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170
Rep:
|
I've yet to see a real problem with SID. It showed a few error messages for something I didn't use anyway and everything still worked. And yes I was using it before the package freeze for sarge. Don't use apt listbugs. It's not as unstable as most people think it is.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|