LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2007, 12:47 PM   #1
Nishtya
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: The armpit of the universe, or at least the armpit of the U.S.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Sabayon, Debian & willing to try any noob friendlies
Posts: 170

Rep: Reputation: 30
Superblock time stamp in future


Debian Etch netinstall all on an ext3 partition of slave disk. Two other installs on the machine, Sid with root on a reiserfs partition and its home on another ext3 partition of slave disk. And Windows XP on master disk FAT32. Windows does not (and I don't want it to!) see or touch my linuxes so it shouldn't be a factor with this problem.

I do have Sid mounting Etch's partition and vice versa automatically. Every 25 mounts or so when fsck goes off on etch's boot, it whines about the date of the superblock being in the future, fixes it and reboots. Then all is fine until the next scheduled fsck.

At first thought the clock on Sid must be fast or Etch slow but have tried various synching and not rebooting to Etch too quickly after having shutdown Sid. Doesn't help. Googling and a helper on another forum came across a previous bug:

Quote:
E2fsck will detect if the superblock's last mount field or last write field is in the future, and offer to fix if so. (Addresses Debian Bug #327580) These problems will be fixed automatically in preen mode since Debian's boot sequence bogusly doesn't set the time correctly until potentially very late in the bootup process, and this can cause false positives which will cause users' systems to fail to boot. (Addresses Debian Bugs #343662 and #343645)
It was supposed to have been fixed in e2fsprogs 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12-31-1 and I currently have version 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1.

Any ideas? It just a bit of a nuisance since I use Sid as my main install that etch gets mounted quite a bit and so anytime I decide to boot the Etch install, fsck generally will be run since its been mounted so many times and I have to wait through a reboot after a fix.
 
Old 01-11-2007, 04:51 AM   #2
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 9,196

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
have you seen this thread:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=518301

??
 
Old 01-11-2007, 06:00 AM   #3
Nishtya
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: The armpit of the universe, or at least the armpit of the U.S.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Sabayon, Debian & willing to try any noob friendlies
Posts: 170

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
That thread says fixed but I don't see where it is? A link here to that post and link there to this post?
 
Old 01-11-2007, 06:05 AM   #4
Thoddy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Bremen, Germany
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nishtya
That thread says fixed but I don't see where it is?
No, my problem is not fixed!! fsck says it fixed my partition errors, but they re-appear every boot time...

...maybe I should rename my thread!?
 
Old 01-11-2007, 01:33 PM   #5
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,067
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 385Reputation: 385Reputation: 385Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thoddy
No, my problem is not fixed!! fsck says it fixed my partition errors, but they re-appear every boot time...

...maybe I should rename my thread!?
I have reported your thread to ask for the thread title to be renamed.
 
Old 01-11-2007, 03:51 PM   #6
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 9,196

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
Quote:
That thread says fixed but I don't see where it is? A link here to that post and link there to this post?
Yeah - I figured you two could put your heads together... and you could easily miss each other.

The behavior you are seeing is correct - debian etch is waiting too long to set the correct time when you boot. You could try the workarounds mentioned in the bug reports. i.e. keep your clock to UTF time.

http://bugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin...cgi?bug=343662
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
presentation time stamp nesta Programming 1 11-24-2006 01:57 AM
Time stamp Kalyani1 Linux - Software 0 11-07-2005 02:58 PM
set up the Time stamp Kalyani1 Linux - Software 3 11-06-2005 02:36 PM
e-mail with time stamp from the future slackist General 1 01-15-2005 10:58 PM
Time stamp in Samba is 11 hours behind time stamp in Linux Linh Linux - General 3 09-04-2003 12:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration