LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-12-2010, 11:01 AM   #1
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
RADEON 9200SE + lenny; problem


Hello people,

I have a problem with my graphics card RADEON 9200 SE.

I have recently installed lenny so my version is 2.6.26-2-686

and the graphics is not as good as before. Namely I can not get the maximal resolution
of which my monitor is capable, and which I had under etch. This is 2048*1536@85

now the display ois only 1600*1200@85 and the gnome "preferences" menu
refuses to do better.
I have the "xserver-xorg-video-radeon"
installed and also "xserver-xorg-video-radeon-dbg"

The Xorg.0.log contains some lines like this:

(II) RADEON (0): Supported Future video modes
(II) RADEON (0): #6 hsize: 2048 vsize 1536 refresh 85 vid 23009

however it remains stil... err... Future video modes,
or better to say for me
the PAST video modes, since I had them with etch.

Is it possible to get them again with Lenny?

Thanks for the help

Stefan
 
Old 01-12-2010, 12:24 PM   #2
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399
What is the output of 'xrandr'?

Adam
 
Old 01-12-2010, 12:32 PM   #3
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 1920 x 1200
VGA-0 connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 395mm x 295mm
1280x1024 85.0 + 84.8 85.0 75.0 60.0
1920x1200 72.8 60.0
1600x1200 85.0* 85.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0
1680x1050 60.0
1600x1024 60.0
1400x1050 85.3 74.8 70.0 60.0
1440x900 60.2
1280x960 85.0 60.0
1280x800 60.0
1152x864 85.1 75.0
1280x768 60.0
1152x768 54.8
1024x768 84.9 85.0 75.1 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 84.9 85.1 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 85.0 84.6 75.0 72.8 72.8 75.0 66.7 60.0 59.9
720x400 85.0 70.1
640x400 85.1
640x350 85.1
DVI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
S-video disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
 
Old 01-12-2010, 12:42 PM   #4
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399
Well the driver is definitely not reading 2048x1536 as a supported resolution, or the VirtualSize it's defaulting to is less than 2048x1536. Can you attach your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file.

Adam
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:13 PM   #5
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I am sorry I tried and got the reply that the text is too long

i will post the first one third of it.

I understand that the xserver does not recognize the max resolution as possible, and this is exactly my problem...
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:21 PM   #6
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Oh I am sorry

you wanted xorg.conf,

I thought you wanted Xlogs.

here is the xorg:

(I changed only one line in the automatically generated xorg.conf, I added
"radeon", but the result is the same...
==================

# xorg.conf (X.Org X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the xorg.conf manual page.
# (Type "man xorg.conf" at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg
# package.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following command:
# sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "kbd"
Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
Option "XkbLayout" "us"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier "Configured Video Device"
Driver "radeon"
Option "UseFBDev" "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Configured Monitor"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Monitor "Configured Monitor"
EndSection
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:42 PM   #7
adamk75
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 3,091

Rep: Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399Reputation: 399
Try this:

Code:
# xorg.conf (X.Org X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the xorg.conf manual page.
# (Type "man xorg.conf" at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg
# package.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following command:
# sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier	"Generic Keyboard"
Driver	 "kbd"
Option	 "XkbRules"	"xorg"
Option	 "XkbModel"	"pc104"
Option	 "XkbLayout"	"us"
EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier	"Configured Mouse"
Driver	 "mouse"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier	"Configured Video Device"
Driver "radeon"
Option	 "UseFBDev"	 "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
Identifier	"Configured Monitor"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier	"Default Screen"
Monitor	 "Configured Monitor"
Device "Configured Video Device"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Virtual 2048 1536
EndSubSection
EndSection
If that doesn't work, I would suggest trying a newer version of the driver.

Adam
 
Old 01-12-2010, 02:45 PM   #8
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Adam,

Thanks! it works like magic.

all the intermediate resolutions are also available.

What does it mean "Virtual"?
I tried already something like

DefaultDepth 24
Subsection "Display"
Depth 1
Modes "1680x1050"
EndSubSection

but it never worked.

What is the difference?


Thankd again!

Stefan
 
Old 01-12-2010, 02:49 PM   #9
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
The "Virtual" keyword is used to describe a screen size (horizontal x vertical resolution) which is NOT the real resolution of the monitor.
For example, if I have a monitor that only displays 1024x768, I could specify a VIRTUAL desktop size of 1600x1200, and the desktop image would actually be 1600x1200, which is larger than that which can be displayed on the monitor, requiring scrolling up/down/left/right to access the outer edges of the image.
 
Old 01-12-2010, 02:59 PM   #10
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Sasha,

thanks for th explanation.

Does that mean that I can set ANY resolution
with this "Virtual" mode?

for example 5000*3000?

the limit resolution of my monitor as specified in the
notice is 2048*1536@85
 
Old 01-12-2010, 03:17 PM   #11
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
You could set whatever virtual size you want, to a point. The maximum is not unlimited but rather, it is limited by both the X server, and your video hardware. Off the top of my head, the limit per screen *might* be somewhere around 4800-something on the horizontal, and 3800-something on the vertical.

You'd have to check your cards documentation, driver docs, and X server man pages, to find out what the limit would be for your setup. I can't accurately remember what the max is.

Sasha
 
Old 01-12-2010, 03:38 PM   #12
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Sasha, thanks

Although there is something which I do not understand here.

I thought that my monitor was not capable to display the images
which have more than 2048*1536 pixels
(of course it can, but at the cost of poorer quality,
so that a group of 4 points on the original image
will be displayed as 1 single point of the color ahich is the average
of the 4 colors in the original).

Now you say that it is capable to display the images of size
4000*3000

So will it really display 4000*3000 different points on the screen?

How can it do this?

It may well happen that I do not understand something basic here,
since all this seems quite strange to me.
 
Old 01-12-2010, 03:51 PM   #13
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
I think you are "trying" to understand, but are missing my point.

The monitor will NOT show an image which is larger than it is capable of showing. That's all there is to that.

Imagine it like this:

I have a 1024x768 monitor, but I set a virtual image size of 1600x1200. The way this works, is the same way as if I had a 1600x1200 monitor, except that it has a "frame" or "window" in front of it that is 1024x768. So the "window" is smaller than the monitor showing the image. I must move the window around in front of the monitor, in order to actually see the edges of the image on the monitor.

Understand?
 
Old 01-13-2010, 01:23 AM   #14
jim_p
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Distribution: Debian testing
Posts: 564

Rep: Reputation: 131Reputation: 131
Are you using the vesa driver instead of the radeon or the fglrx one?
Vesa's abilities are very very limited, eg no xv, no 3d, only 4:3 resolutions etc...
 
Old 01-13-2010, 04:56 AM   #15
stefan_578
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Sasha:

yes I think I understand, thanks for the explanation.

The point is that the monitor is capable of 2048*1536@85
- real resolution, not virtual.

I would like to obtain this, the reason is that it gives better quality of images.
I had this resolution before, and it is strange to me that I can not
obtain it now with lenny, which seems to be better version of debian than etch.

jim_p: i am using the radeon driver, not the vesa, neither fglrx

many thanks for your help!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem Using 3D Hardware Acceleration On ATI Radeon 9200SE DPSellyChan Linux - Hardware 7 02-13-2006 02:12 PM
problem with mplayer/mythtv and the xv extension on ati radeon 9200SE datphysh Linux - Software 1 07-18-2005 10:18 AM
ATI Radeon 9200SE + TV-Out. No Video Problem. startail Linux - Hardware 3 04-19-2005 07:49 AM
radeon 9200se canyon289 Linux - Hardware 1 11-09-2004 09:09 AM
Ati Radeon 9200SE problem configuration Hyper1on Linux - Newbie 28 10-03-2004 02:18 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration