LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-16-2012, 08:53 PM   #1
aquaboot
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA.
Distribution: debain freebsd
Posts: 483

Rep: Reputation: 31
Please double check my partitioning scheme


Hi All,

Just wanted to run this partition scheme by the forum to see if this looks okay or if there are any snags that I'm not seeing. I'd rather correct it now than have it bite me later. I have a 2 tb hard drive and have installed Debian Squeeze. At the manual partition section during install, I created the following ext 4 file system partitions:

1. 500 mb /boot (primary)
2. 14 gb / (primary)
3. 10 gb swap (primary) 4 gb RAM
4. 1.75+ tb /home (logical)


Thanks Much,

ab

Last edited by aquaboot; 12-16-2012 at 09:10 PM.
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:04 PM   #2
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,711
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635
The root partition seems a little large. But then again, I am not an expert in partitioning.
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:04 PM   #3
Hungry ghost
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,222

Rep: Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667Reputation: 667
Hi,

First, I don't think you will need so much swap; I have 4gb of RAM, and I only have 2 gb of swap (and the system rarely uses it). Second, I don't understand what you wrote for the home partition (the 1.75 part). If it's only 1.75gb, I would suggest to make it considerably bigger, at least 10 gb. My /home partition has 57gb, and now it's used at 63%. Of course, it all depends on the use you will give to this system, and how many files you plan to save in it, but, IMO, it's better to have a /home partition with a considerable size.

Other than that, your partitioning scheme looks fine to me.

edit: Forgot to say: I would make them all logical, in case you decide to add other partitions in the future (for data, distro hoping, etc).

Last edited by Hungry ghost; 12-16-2012 at 09:08 PM. Reason: Additional information.
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:09 PM   #4
aquaboot
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA.
Distribution: debain freebsd
Posts: 483

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Sorry. /home is the remainder of the hard drive. That should read 1.75+ tb, so yeah, there's plenty of room. Thanks for the help guys.

-ab
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:22 PM   #5
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
I tend to go by the KISS principle nowadays so my partitioning scheme for every desktop/laptop related is simple and is like this.
/ 10GB (15 -20GB if you are going to install absolutely everything).
SWAP 2GB
/home the rest.

I used to have seperate discs for different partition mount points such as /boot and /usr etc. but realistically all you will need is /, SWAP, and /home. Thus the KISS principle.
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:34 PM   #6
aquaboot
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA.
Distribution: debain freebsd
Posts: 483

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Thanks k3lt01,

I agree, best to KISS. The majority of space consideration will be the storing of media files and photos by users. If stored in their home directories, I'm assuming these files and photos will eat space from /home, no? That's why I wanted it to be so big.

-ab
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:38 PM   #7
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquaboot View Post
I'm assuming these files and photos will eat space from /home,
Yep that's correct, so maximising /home is what you want to do.
 
Old 12-16-2012, 09:43 PM   #8
aquaboot
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA.
Distribution: debain freebsd
Posts: 483

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Excellent. Thanks again.

ab
 
Old 12-18-2012, 01:04 PM   #9
utanja
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Europe:Salzburg Austria USA:Orlando,Florida;
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 643

Rep: Reputation: 32
I use 50gig for home sounds good enough for me.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partitioning schemes for a web-oriented server unearthed Linux - Software 3 06-18-2009 08:10 PM
Partitioning Schemes SlackWareWolf Slackware 3 03-02-2008 12:07 AM
Optimal partitioning schemes d00bid00b Linux - Software 9 08-16-2006 01:00 PM
Partitioning schemes snocked Linux - General 1 02-01-2004 05:20 AM
Advantages and Drawbacks of Different Partitioning Schemes BillRice Linux - Security 0 03-01-2002 01:39 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration