Maybe restart as WTF in security... https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ux-security-4/ der?

Probably nobody does know how to get your card working under Kali without actually doing it. That is because for most people using Kali a sound card isn't even needed.
As for the kernel -- as far as I know Kali runs as root so sudo and all that is unnecessary. Compiling your own kernel like this may work.
However, the very fact you need people to tell you this means that Kali is not for you.

1 members found this post helpful.

To get the card working one could look up its PCI ID and if it is not in running kernel get an out-of-kernel driver from ALSA. But I'm sure this advice is greek for our Kali hero, too. He wants fish instead of fishing pole.

First, calm down. Insulting everyone isn't going to get you any help. Just because you don't understand how people are trying to help, doesn't mean that they aren't.

I can't say for certain why your audio won't work. Here's what I can say for certain:

Here, you list the directory above the current one (which is what ".." denotes), asking for files that end in ".deb". As you see, in the directory above the current one (/usr/src/linux-4.5), you have two files that meet this criteria.

Still in the current directory (see where I'm going with this?), you try to directly execute these .deb files in the directory above (correctly using the "..", however), which are not executable. So it fails.

Here, you try to install the .deb package using dpkg, but the file is not in this directory. It's in the directory above. Hence the message "cannot access archive: No such file or directory". You also prefix the command with "sudo", which is unnecessary since you're already logged in as root ("root@kali").

This one is the same as above, but without the sudo. Still doesn't exist in that directory, so not found again...

Here's a mix of some of the above, where you try to execute the non-executable files directly (which isn't going to work), and prefixed with an unnecessary sudo again.

...same thing as above essentially.

You could cd into the actual directory where the packages are, and run dpkg from there.

Also, not that you care, but +1 to using a distro that doesn't have a specific use case. You're just going to get frustrated, because there simply aren't going to be fixes for some things that will make Kali into what you want to make it into. It's not a standard desktop distro.

1 members found this post helpful.

May actually be better off with Backtrack5 http://www.backtrack-linux.org/downloads/
from a share network or some archive somewhere? But of course, will have even bigger security issues so not really recommended!!! (Like Kali. )

thank you very much Urbankws, for a cardinal direction.

noob errors that i can see now.