I think you are talking of binary package while I'm talking of source kernel package.
I completly agree that for somebody new to this , its far better (and even easier in case of compile bug) to recompile a kernel using make,.. because it will work on every distro and will also work for other applications that are not provided by debian (and don't have a debian/rules file in their .tar.gz).
I sometimes recompile my kernel like this because I can't remember the line to type with make-kpkg (command that I also sometimes forget lol)
On the other hand doing it with make-kpkg to recompile a kernel will create a binary kernel package that you can for example easily uninstall with apt-get remove (and the doc in /usr/share/doc) ,..
hkhiroya, both methods are details here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/re...kernel.en.html
The other solution will be to install a binary package directly. A very general one with lots of stuff not needed but that would probably not slow the system.
Depends if you want to learn the inside of linux or if you have no time for this and only want to use it.