LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-02-2005, 05:36 AM   #1
cccc
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 822
Thanked: 2
kernel 2.6.8-2-386 or 2.6.8-2-686


[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
hi

what's different between:

kernel-2.6.8-2-386

and

kernel-2.6.8-2-686 ?


which kernel should I install on my PC ?

Hardware:
P4, 2GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB disc

kind regards
cccc
cccc is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 05:41 AM   #2
dukeinlondon
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London
Distribution: kubuntu 8.10
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 1
Thanked: 0
the second one is built with optimisation for your processor. Go for that one.
dukeinlondon is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 05:52 AM   #3
cccc
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 822
Thanked: 2

Original Poster
thanks, but how can I get this one ?

if I start the installation of Sarge Stable ,
I press F1 for help, choose linux26, then kernel-2.6.8-2-386 will be automatically installed.
Where can I choose kernel-2.6.8-2-686 ?
cccc is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 06:03 AM   #4
greenleaf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
Thanked: 0
I'm not sure about the naming - I usually build kernel from source whilst the names you have quoted probably refer to binaries. But the usual thing is that it depends on the target processor type and its corresponding instruction set. A Pentium 4 knows all about 386 instructions, but a 386 does not know all about a Pentium 4's instructions. In general a kernel will run more efficiently if it has been built for the processor on which it will run. Your P4 should run either kernel, but the performance from the 686 version ought to be better.

If you don't intend to use the kernel on any other platform than your P4, then the 686 version ought to be more suitable.

The versioning for 2.6 kernels as specified in the provided configuration options (for 2.6.8-11) is more specific: 386, 486, 586, Pentium-Classic, Pentium-MMX, Pentium-Pro, Pentium-II, Pentium-III, Pentium-4, K6, Athlon, Crusoe, Efficeon, Winchip-C6, Winchip-2, Winchip-2A, CyrixIII/VIA C3, VIA C3-2 for VIA C3-2 "Nehemiah" (model 9 and above). "686" is not listed, which is why I'm not quite sure about that binary. What I would do is install the 686 version and then drop back to 386 if it doesn't work.
greenleaf is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 06:04 AM   #5
Xian
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: 33.31N -111.97W
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 918
Thanked: 2
I'm not sure if it can be done during installation....
But it can be easily installed upon your first boot with Apt.
Xian is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 06:07 AM   #6
greenleaf
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
Thanked: 0
If you have to install the 386, it will work. But you may be able to install a 686 version later. I generally have more than one version available at any one time and then choose which one to use at boot time.
greenleaf is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2005, 09:19 AM   #7
saman007uk
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: ~root
Distribution: Ubuntu and Debian
Posts: 361
Thanked: 2
The kernel-2.6.8-2-686 kernel contains optimizations for PIII/P4/Athlon processors. To install it:

Code:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
saman007uk is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2005, 08:51 AM   #8
juanjavier_xxx
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain
Distribution: Quadral boot: WinXP, Debian Sarge, Testing and Sid. Got another machine that boots FreeBSD :-P
Posts: 182
Thanked: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by greenleaf
I generally have more than one version available at any one time and then choose which one to use at boot time.
---Me too; that is a fine idea; and can easily managed via GRUB.

Quote:
Originally posted by saman007uk

Code:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
---Correct; but...donīt forget to reboot when you're finished.....anyway the kernel install process will remind you, I think....

Good luck,
juanjavier_xxx is offline     Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
386 or 686 does it matter? medya Linux - General 2 10-25-2005 03:15 PM
386 or 686 does it matter? medya Linux - General 1 10-25-2005 05:57 AM
i-386 vs i-686 scooby04 Linux - General 1 05-04-2005 02:08 PM
Please explain "386" vs. "686" versions vinoloco Linux - Newbie 4 04-05-2005 08:03 PM
Real-life speed diference between 386,586 and 686 optimized distros Embedded Linux - Distributions 4 06-19-2003 01:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration