Is Debian 3.1r4 "stable" really stable or it just called that?
DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is Debian 3.1r4 "stable" really stable or it just called that?
They call it the stable release, but because everyone puts quotes around the word stable, which sometimes is a hint of irony. Then they have the r4 tacked on end, it suggests to me an incomplete distribution; or that is what other distributions tack on to the end of version names when they are putting out a product that is broken just so people can test it out and provide bug reports Yet I can't find information about this on their Web site. Does Debian generally aim for stability or are for feeding you upgrades that take you to flakey, bleeding-edge applications that make it difficult to get work done?
See the Debian FAQ - it answers this kind of question.
Debian Stable is the most stable in town.
It's so stable it makes the strongest of the others look like an LA freeway overpass.
You get the scare quotes because it is soooo stable that calling it stable is an understatement of gigantic proportions. "Testing" is quite stable and "unstable" is pretty stable.
Debian 3.1r4 (Sarge) is so "stable" at this point, it's barely breathing. You don't really want to mess with it, if that's part of your question. If you want to install Debian at this point in time install Etch (Testing). It will shortly become the new Stable, and it's ready now.
rickh, love your post. "...so "stable" at this point, it's barely breathing." Ha! Sarge is a bit on the stodgy side. I sure wouldn't use for my desktop.
Location: Europe:Salzburg Austria USA:Orlando,Florida;
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 643
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by alioop
rickh, love your post. "...so "stable" at this point, it's barely breathing." Ha! Sarge is a bit on the stodgy side. I sure wouldn't use for my desktop.
Sarge is a good way for a debian newbie to get started.....
I use 'etch' and it has been very stable for a long time. When it goes stable, does it make sense to stick with testing but wait a bit before doing an upgrade, due to some flakyness that will undoubtedly be introduced during the transition? Will the new testing be called 'sid'? or something else?
The new "testing" will be called Lenny, and my recommendation is that you change your sources.list to "testing" so that you stay in testing when Etch goes to Stable. There will not be a lot of problems in Testing after the freeze, but it's likely that there will be in Sid (Unstable).
Stable is ready for the server and production workstation environment. Testing is almost always better for the home desktop. The only time in the last few years that widespread problems have migrated into Testing was during the conversion from XFree86 to Xorg.
Location: Europe:Salzburg Austria USA:Orlando,Florida;
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 643
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by alioop
Don't think using Etch would hinder a newbie one bit.
Although rock solid, I won't back off on my opinion of Sarge one bit. Stodgy, stodgy, stodgy. Etch is the only way to go in Debian.
i am not disagreeing only suggesting that until a newbie learns all the intricacies of updating etc...sarge is good....I run both sarge as a server as well as on three work stations....the others use etch as one uses SID...
The new "testing" will be called Lenny, and my recommendation is that you change your sources.list to "testing" so that you stay in testing when Etch goes to Stable. ...
Wow, just finished installing sarge. GNOME is so fast, is like I have a brand new computer. GNOME on Debian is as fast as Xubuntu.
Do I need to install the Print server package? I just have Brother laser printer, non-network compatible, with USB plug. I not sure if that package maybe is for people with businessess.
Are packages that are not installed by default, such as Firefox, not considered stable?
The only problem there, as others have stated, is that Etch is about to become stable. Sarge is a bit long in the tooth now. I have been using stable while I got used to Debian but will change my sources.list to testing as soon as the upgrade path to Etch is finalized.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.