[SOLVED] How is sudo and ufw enabled if the service is not activated in MATE Control Center?
DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Sudo can be enabled by editing the sudoers file. There's a special command for doing so: visudo. This article will tell you more: https://wiki.debian.org/sudo
Uncomplicated firewall (which is what I assume you mean by ufw, as opposed to the United Farm
Workers of America) is an application which you will need to install. It is used to configure iptables; gufw is a GUI interface for iptables that is easier to use than ufw. You can also configure iptables by writing iptables rules directly.
Sudo can be enabled by editing the sudoers file. There's a special command for doing so: visudo. This article will tell you more: https://wiki.debian.org/sudo
Uncomplicated firewall (which is what I assume you mean by ufw, as opposed to the United Farm
Workers of America) is an application which you will need to install. It is used to configure iptables; gufw is a GUI interface for iptables that is easier to use than ufw. You can also configure iptables by writing iptables rules directly.
Both ufw and gufw should be in the repos.
Hi Frank.
But as I said, I already use sudo.
Both ufw and gufw are already installed.
My confusion is due to both sudo and ufw not being activated according to the services option in MATE Control Center.
My confusion is due to both sudo and ufw not being activated according to the services option in MATE Control Center.
The short answer is this: They have nothing to with MATE. They work at an OS level, not at a GUI level.
It would be possible for the MATE developers to include firewall configuration capability in MATE if they wished to, but that might make MATE less portable to other versions of Linux. The Magiea Control Center and OpenSuSE's YAST both include firewall configuration items, so it can be done.
The same goes for sudo configuration capability, but, in all my distro hopping I have not seen a "control center" that includes sudo configuration, when visudo is readily available. Remember, most distros, aside from Ubuntu and its derivatives, do not default to sudo; they default to su. Sudo is historically intended to be used to give users specific access to particular rights that they need to do their tasks, not blanket access to root capability. Ubuntu's use of it is--how shall I put this tactfully?--aberrant.
The short answer is this: They have nothing to with MATE. They work at an OS level, not at a GUI level.
It would be possible for the MATE developers to include firewall configuration capability in MATE if they wished to, but that might make MATE less portable to other versions of Linux. The Magiea Control Center and OpenSuSE's YAST both include firewall configuration items, so it can be done.
The same goes for sudo configuration capability, but, in all my distro hopping I have not seen a "control center" that includes sudo configuration, when visudo is readily available. Remember, most distros, aside from Ubuntu and its derivatives, do not default to sudo; they default to su. Sudo is historically intended to be used to give users specific access to particular rights that they need to do their tasks, not blanket access to root capability. Ubuntu's use of it is--how shall I put this tactfully?--aberrant.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.