LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2011, 07:40 PM   #1
m_yates
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Upstate
Distribution: Debian, Mint, Mythbuntu
Posts: 1,176

Rep: Reputation: 54
distrowatch gave squeeze a poor review :(


I was disappointed to read the poor review of squeeze on distrowatch today.

I thought of leaving a comment below the story, but figured why bother. The main complaint appears to be about the appearance of the desktop, and the graphical installer "feels old." Then he goes on to recommend Trisquel instead as a "better Debian-based distribution" than Debian. Huh? What the hell?
 
Old 02-21-2011, 08:03 PM   #2
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
... oh yeah... ??!!

I'm Using it... built several packages for it.. so far it performed flawlessly... so FSCK distrowatch...
 
Old 02-21-2011, 08:13 PM   #3
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Wheezy/Jessie/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,236

Rep: Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545
Too bad for the Debian developers, I feel sorry for them. They did a real good job on Squeeze.

I have my doubts about the quality of the review. In the first paragraph he mentions that support for ARM was dropped. Dropped? I think it is one of the hottest ports at the moment.

And the ancient installer... better have a flashy graphic installer, and unstable software? I am happy the Debian developers put their effort in the applications and not in the installer.

Next week I am up to upgrading a HP laptop running Etch. Let s see...

jlinkels
 
Old 02-21-2011, 09:15 PM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,651
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
Already gave a comment to them that they should rename the side to either DesktopDistroWatch or WindowsLikeDistroWatch.
But what bothers me more than the poor review are the comments from people that actually give a fsck about software-freedom and spread the opinion that linux will never break through if they try to make free distros. What they want is not Linux, what they want is a free replacement for Windows that is exactly like Windows, but without the malware, and with the geek-factor, so that they can feel "1337".
 
Old 02-21-2011, 09:29 PM   #5
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
Windows, and now Ubuntu, support the idea that an operating system should come configured for you. Debian provides a base from which a user can select any desktop environment or software package that they want to. The user does the configuring, not the developers.

It's a shame that DW compared Debian to Ubuntu and Mint. Debian has entirely different goals and frankly doesn't give a flying fsck if they are similar to Ubuntu.

Oh well, it's not my problem that those guys are missing out on one of the finest Linux distro's in existence.
 
Old 02-21-2011, 10:51 PM   #6
frankbell
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Mageia, Mint
Posts: 8,236

Rep: Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555Reputation: 1555
As someone who cut his teeth on Slackware, I must say that I really like Debian. It's really different, but it's got the same back-to-basics rock-solid feel to it.

I have two computers that came with factory-installed Ubuntu and Broadcom wireless chips that work with Ubuntu.

I therefore tolerate Ubuntu. Using Fluxbox on Ubuntu enables me to forget that it's Ubuntu until I have to sudo su instead of just su.

'nuff said.
 
Old 02-21-2011, 10:57 PM   #7
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,899

Rep: Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623Reputation: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by eveningsky339 View Post
Windows, and now Ubuntu, support the idea that an operating system should come configured for you. Debian provides a base from which a user can select any desktop environment or software package that they want to. The user does the configuring, not the developers.

It's a shame that DW compared Debian to Ubuntu and Mint. Debian has entirely different goals and frankly doesn't give a flying fsck if they are similar to Ubuntu.

Oh well, it's not my problem that those guys are missing out on one of the finest Linux distro's in existence.
And you have hit the nail on the head with this post. People are now expecting distributions to be fully setup. People used to call it a Windows Mindset, only the other day on another forum I called it an Ubuntu Mindset (and I got in trouble for it to) because people who are used to Ubuntu want Debian to behave the same way. I moved from Ubuntu to Debian because I don't want, correction .... need, a lot of bling. I want a stable system that works for me and uses minimal resources.
 
Old 02-21-2011, 11:06 PM   #8
almatic
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 547

Rep: Reputation: 67
so he was missing a desktop firewall, huh ?
wait until he discovers that debian doesn't even have a trial version of norton antivirus pre-installed.
And for the old installer, maybe the debdevs can add some wobbly windows for all those windows users.

But seriously, maybe it would make sense to rename the branches. I think "testing" is a bit misleading and underrating and scares many people, who then install stable on their top-notch desktop and complain about too old software. It would probably be better to name testing "desktop" and stable "server".
 
Old 02-22-2011, 07:05 AM   #9
darkduck
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: London
Distribution: Mageia, Debian, Mint
Posts: 490

Rep: Reputation: 26
There are couple of my reviews of Debian, if you want to lynch me. 8-)

http://linuxblog.darkduck.com/2011/0...0-squeeze.html
http://linuxblog.darkduck.com/2011/0...-with-tux.html
 
Old 02-22-2011, 08:52 AM   #10
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: OpenBSD, DragonFly BSD
Posts: 1,408

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The "review" is fud...

Quote:
Administrators looking for a server distro can get up and running quickly with Ubuntu's server edition
Ubuntu better for servers than Debian..............?

Last edited by cynwulf; 02-22-2011 at 08:53 AM.
 
Old 02-22-2011, 09:12 AM   #11
darkduck
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: London
Distribution: Mageia, Debian, Mint
Posts: 490

Rep: Reputation: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caravel View Post
The "review" is fud...


Ubuntu better for servers than Debian..............?
I am not big specialist, but I can advocate Ubuntu (Advocate of Devil? ). As long as there is Ubuntu server edition, why can't they compete with Debian on server market?
 
Old 02-23-2011, 04:38 AM   #12
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: OpenBSD, DragonFly BSD
Posts: 1,408

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
That's not the issue - which is that according to this reviewer 'buntu server is somehow a better choice - when it clearly isn't. If there's one area where debian stable dominates, it's servers.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 06:26 AM   #13
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,651
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkduck View Post
As long as there is Ubuntu server edition, why can't they compete with Debian on server market?
Simple as that, Ubuntu is made from Debian Unstable (except the LTS versions, they are made from Testing). They collect the software, integrate it, make alpha- and beta-testing, and that all in six months. Even the LTS-versions, and have a look how buggy 10.04 was at release-time.
Would you base your server on this, especially when a downtime costs money? I would prefer a distro that is much more tested, like Debian, RHEL/CentOS or Slackware.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 11:05 AM   #14
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Simple as that, Ubuntu is made from Debian Unstable (except the LTS versions, they are made from Testing). They collect the software, integrate it, make alpha- and beta-testing, and that all in six months. Even the LTS-versions, and have a look how buggy 10.04 was at release-time.
Would you base your server on this, especially when a downtime costs money? I would prefer a distro that is much more tested, like Debian, RHEL/CentOS or Slackware.
++1

Or Solaris...

Last edited by Alexvader; 02-23-2011 at 11:06 AM.
 
Old 02-23-2011, 12:46 PM   #15
utanja
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Europe:Salzburg Austria USA:Orlando,Florida;
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 625

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caravel View Post
The "review" is fud...


Ubuntu better for servers than Debian..............?
Really????
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Debian 6 Squeeze Review LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-13-2011 02:30 PM
LXer: CDLinux 0.9.2 Community Edition Review (DistroWatch Weekly #310) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-06-2009 02:50 PM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: Review of Mandriva Linux 2007.1, 64-bit KNOPPIX LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-30-2007 05:17 AM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: FreeBSD 6.2, review of Pardus Linux 2007 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-15-2007 06:21 AM
OpenBSD review on DistroWatch chort *BSD 0 07-10-2004 04:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration