DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
A website for a distro should reflect the distro. In Debian's case, it's lightweight, easy to navigate and very functional. Why do people think a site needs flash or graphics or videos to be any good?
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux 16.04, Debian 10, LineageOS 14.1
Posts: 1,572
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP
A website for a distro should reflect the distro. In Debian's case, it's lightweight,
Five DVDs is hardly "lightweight".
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP
Why do people think a site needs flash or graphics or videos to be any good?
A description of appearance (in this case, "ugly") should not be confused with a description of usefulness (in this case, "any good"). Two very separate ideas happening here.
5 DVDs, as has been said many many many times before, are for people who want to download the whole set to install offline. I use the netinstall which is 135-175mb or you can even get the image for a 50mb CD. Horses for courses, but lightweight doesn't mean how many DVDs or CDs you can get.
As to the ugliness, it's all in the eye of the beholder. The designers believe in a minimal look and that, to them, looks good.
Regardless, having to read an install guide to change a full distro into a "lightweight install" does not change the fact that it is a full (and mighty big) distro. Accept it. It's five DVDs of magic. five dvds!!!! You can't get fuller than that. That's the antithesis of compact. It's the antithesis of small. It's big. It's gigantic. In fact, I can't think of a distro that's larger. 5 dvds!!!! Is there a larger distro? I think not.
Last edited by mark_alfred; 05-10-2009 at 02:17 AM.
The 5 DVDs also include apps off the main repos. If any distro offered a full download of the OS and the repos they too would be on 5 DVDs. And lightweight doesn't mean the number of install media, it refers to startup, options and services enabled and general bloatiness or lack of it.
I guess you could sum it up as Debian is as big as you want it to be.
If you want to install every package from five DVD's you can.
Alternatively you can have a minimalist system with no X,gui or anything.
I think it's one of the great things about Debian,you are in control of the install.
You are not tied in to what someone else thinks should be on your system.
Totally agree, but is debian a cruft ridden mess? I'd say no.
Quote:
In Debian's case, it's lightweight, easy to navigate and very functional.
Debian.org is maybe lightweight but it's certainly not easy to navigate or at all functional. The site is a right mess and incredibly difficult to decipher. This is mainly due to info cruft gathering on almost all pages. The text is waay to lenghy and almost impossible to scan for the stuff you are looking for. It needs some serious editing in my view.
Quote:
Why do people think a site needs flash or graphics or videos to be any good?
Comments like the above crop up in every discussion about the debian website, it't totally irrelevant. Nobody has mentioned flash or videos or even images.
The current website in a visual mess that makes it *very* hard to find stuff. The website could be redesigned to be even lighter but much much clearer and even beautiful.
Visual design and function are very much connected when it comes to information for human digestion. The idea that the debian website is good because it's old-school is rubbish. If the site was just Html text with no formatting it would probably be better. Much of the design of w.d.o actually makes it worse than a totally undesigned website.
The current website in a visual mess that makes it *very* hard to find stuff.
just to decipher it:
if one clicks on "getting debian" one is getting linked to the sides where one might download the different images. if one then clicks on "http", one might download from a http-server. if one then clicks on "stable", one gets linked to download the stable branch...
if one clicks on " support" one is getting linked to the sides where one gets support on different questions (documentation, wiki, known problems...)
...
that shouldn`t be to hard.
and i don`t think its ugly (but i`ve never thought about it before).
greetings
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.