DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I downloaded Sarge Debian a while ago to see what it would be like to use Debian, Debian is the fastest. most reliable most stable version of Linux that I've ever used so Now I would like to buy Debian CD-S direct from the factory only problem is that I don't know which version to buy the Version thats listed as stable or the version that is listed as UN- stable
Someone told me not to download the stable version because the UN stable version was better... I have no idea why but lol anyways I dont want to make a mistake and buy the wrong version so I thought Id come here and ask before purchasing the CD/s
Here is the link to the website where I plan to buy the Official version of Debian http://010101.biz/
Any suggestions on which one to buy will be appreciated I should recive the CD/s by friday if I place the order today
The definitive answer depends on what are you intending to do with it.
If for desktop/workstation usage, I strongly discourage from using the current Debian stable ('woody') 3.0 release as that is effectively almost three years old by now... It just can't provide an enjoyable desktop/workstation experience, and it can be problematic to get installed on very recent hardware.
For desktop/workstation usage I recommend using the Debian testing ('sarge') version as that is pretty much up to date regarding everything.
The unstable ('sid') version is only recommended really if one is ready to accept that things can and will break sooner or later, and is familiar with the apt/dpkg utils with how to fix things when such breakage occurs.
In my opinion the best solution currently regarding Debian is to use testing and then if necessary use certain packages from unstable.
Installation images for Debian testing 'sarge' can be found here: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
If you have a decent Internet connection (non-dialup), I recommend using the net installation image from there.
And as you mentioned you are considering purchasing disks, I am not aware of any places where one could buy a set of disks of 'sarge'.
I was going to buy the version that is listed as being stable because I assumed that it would be better to buy a version thats stable.. instead of one that is still being tested... it's a good thing I came here and asked before purchasing the OS
Here is the version that I'm going to purchase
Debian GNU/Linux testing ("Sarge")
The 'testing' distribution of Debian, Sarge (also named for a Toy Story character), is currently undergoing refinement for impending release as Debian 3.1. Sarge offers a much newer collection of software and a greatly improved installer. However, it lacks the degree of testing that the 'stable' release has endured and is not yet supported by the Debian security team. The significance of the updates in Sarge make it the suggested distribution if you are installing outside a server environment.
1702fp, it really depends on what you intend to use Debian for. If timely security updates are important for you i.e. you run a server and that glitzy eye candy is something you can do without then Debian Woody 3.0 r 4 is for you. Sarge aka Debian 3.1 while destained to be next Stable soon, and apparently the DPL - Martin Michlmayr indicated in a recent interview carried by newsforge.com that it is likely to be by this month, to be absolutely honest, we cannot at this point afford you a definite date as to when "soon" is. In Debian talk, it'll be ready when it is ready. Many has critisized Debian as trying to play god in ensuring that the base code is so thoroughly audited. It is something akin to the OpenBSD of the GNU/Linux world and consequently the reputation for being a secure and stable distro (base install excluding add-ons like GUI DEs and apps).
Contrary to what many thinks about Testing aka Sarge i.e. that being near a release date, its security infrastructure/buildd should be well in place, well, it is NOT. According to sjoerd, seb28 (Sebastian Bacher), ross (Ross Burton of Debian X-Strikeforce and Debian GNOME fame), jordim (Jordi Mallach), thom, lool and other devels/maintainers hanging out on #debian-devel on irc.freenode.net and #gnome-debian on irc.gnome.org, at the moment if one wants security updates for Testing/Sarge, one has to manually fetch them from Unstable/Sid.
Now, let's consider Unstable/Sid, have been running it for years now, has it given me problems? To be honest, yes. But does it deserve its reputation of being "unstable", I and many others running a mix of Unstable/Experimental aka Sid/Scud beg to differ. To run Unstable/Experimental, you are likely to be one who wants the very latest, haemorragingly bleeding edge software, many a times within hours or at most a few days after new package versions are released by upstream authors e.g. abiword went straight into Unstable the day upstream announced a new point release. Going a bit further back, GNOME 2.8 hit Experimental but an hour (was prior to this existing as GNOME 2.7 for weeks) after the official announcement of its launch by GNOME itself. To run Unstable/Experimental, you NEED to install apt-listchanges, apt-listbugs so that you not get any unwanted shocks to your nervous system.
What do apt-listchanges and list-bugs do? Well, they do what their names imply they do i.e. one fetches the changelogs containg changes, patches from both upstream as well as from the Debian devels/maintainers/nmu, the other fetches the bug reports for the packages off b.d.o. Debian Unstable aka Sid is times more Stable than Slackware Current or Mandrake ever is or ever can be. It is the Experimental branch/distro (an imcomplete distro by itself, Debianists use it in combination with Unstable) that is buggy. In running Experimental, you need to acquaint yourself with the idea/philosophy i.e. "if it breaks, I get to keep the pieces". One can very well just run Unstable/Sid alone without the need for Experimental, many do. I just happened to be one of those who don't. Ultimately, the choice is in your OWN hands.
Before I end, let me say that be it Testing/Sarge OR Unstable/Sid or Unstable + Experimental i.e. Sid + Scud, WITHOUT broadband, they are NO fun. The TRUE power of the APT suite can only be experienced and felt with a broadband connection be it for the installation of binary .debs or building/rebuilding of source packages (.tar.gz) from e.g. http://mentors.debian.net/ or packaging your own debs (fetching the necessary dependencies along the way).
One thing that I missed out explaining i.e. Colin Watson - man behind the Debian Release Team replied in a thread on the Debian User mailing lists about a year or so ago explained that "Unstable" does not neccessarily mean the packages in this release/branch/distro are inherently buggy but rather Unstable is a branch that is "volatile" i.e. where packages are constantly on the move either out of Experimental and into Unstable or from Unstable into Testing. Do not attempt to interpret "Unstable" literally, interpret it the Debian way.
...Do not attempt to interpret "Unstable" literally, interpret it the Debian way.
Yep, from how I understand things, stable/unstable refers to the package versions. In the stable release, the package versions remain the same (aka stable), whilst with the unstable branch they often change - ergo unstable.
For example, in the stable release, if you install the package foo-3.2.1.deb, later on down the road, even after a year's worth of security updates and such, it will still be foo-3.2.1.deb (though perhaps with a -1 or -2 tacked on to the end). This allows for things like particular apps to keep on working if they rely on a certain package version.
It has nothing to do with whether or not something will crash. Keep that idea of unstable for winders ;o)
Originally posted by f1dave In all honesty i don't think it matters.
As soon as sarge becomes official, i'll still stay on the bleeding edge with the new testing version, whatever that will be called...
f1dave, the new "testing" after Sarge is "Etch". My advise is do not try to run it. From experience, there is a period i.e. ~6 months after a Stable release to ~1 year prior to the next Stable, "testing" is often in a quite b0rked and poorly maintained state. This was the case with Woody after Potato's release and Sarge some 6 months after Woody's release. If you really want to live "Dangerously" (just jkg ) ... I mean on the "Bleeding Edge" of things, perform a dist-upgrade and pin Unstable instead.
Etch eh? As in the little etch-a-sketch dude? Hmm. Living dangerously during that period may be more like living as Roger Explosion. (Don't try and understand that if you're not Australian or haven't seen Full Frontal. Ahh FF, how we miss you.) :P
BTW, I also noticed in a HOWTO (copyrighted 2005) on Debian's page that currently Etch is testing and Sarge is the stable version. But I didn't see any official announcement saying that. The main page still claims that Sarge corresponds to testing.
So, which is which at the moment? Are the Debian mirrors 'testing' branches pointing to Etch or to Sarge?
Originally posted by harken BTW, I also noticed in a HOWTO (copyrighted 2005) on Debian's page that currently Etch is testing and Sarge is the stable version. But I didn't see any official announcement saying that. The main page still claims that Sarge corresponds to testing.
So, which is which at the moment? Are the Debian mirrors 'testing' branches pointing to Etch or to Sarge?
No official announcement yet harken. The security buildd on a few of the arches are not fully in place yet. I'm curious as to which HOWTO and on which page that is that you are referring to. 2 of the first places where news of an impending release will be broadcasted will be the devel channels e.g. #debian-devel, #debian-boot and the users' channel - #debian on irc.freenode.net and #gnome-debian on irc.gnome.org. I'm a reg on these channels. No news thus far sorry.
Topic for #debian:
Topic (#debian): READ FAQ: http://www.linuks.mine.nu/debian-faq-wiki/ | READ BTS: /msg dpkg bts | Paste in #flood or /msg dpkg paster, NOT here | /msg bots NOT people | Knoppix/Ubuntu/Mepis/Kurumin are NOT Debian | Sarge Base+Standard frozen; installer: /msg dpkg d-i | sarge not out /msg dpkg wwsr | X.org -> /msg dpkg xorg | Java -> /msg dpkg java | YES, xserver-xfree86 -12 IS BUSTED ON i386
-:- Topic (#debian): set by dondelelcaro at Wed Feb 23 13:09:02 2005
Topic for #gnome-debian on irc.gnome.org reads:
-:- Topic (#gnome-debian): GNOME 2.8.2 in testing | Contact jbailey if interested in maintaining evolution-exchange | Get Sound-Juicer, now with version inflation! | <jordi> joey: gee, don't call me "official non-mainainer" of evo or people will joke at me in #gnome-debian
-:- Topic (#gnome-debian): set by jordim at Fri Feb 11 17:22:30 2005
The only news of significance - well, significant for me is that gtk+2.0/2.6.2-3 will enter testing tonight for all archs including s390.