DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm running Sarge (dist-upgraded to testing) and KDE 3.3. Even though I have 1 GB of RAM, none is free even when running nothing but Mozilla Firefox.
I've got just a basic installation of Debian, with basically just the default apps running in the background. XFree86 and firefox-bin consumes over 250 MB alone.
I this normal? I thought 1 GB of RAM would be more than enough to run kde and a web browser.
Kenneho,
once I had the same doubt. I read somewhere that in kernels 2.6.x (not sure about the version) the system occupies a lot of memory because for the sake of performance.
According to the article, most of the RAM is devoted do disk caching.
In fact, although my memory is almost full I have not noticed overall performance degradation, so I assume that it's not a Debian or KDE specific issue.
I was pretty happy with the fact that the memory was fully occupied with low priority/resource consuming processes.
Yeah this is how unix memory management works. Unix's memory management poses the question of if there is free memory, why not use it? So what it does is cache recently used/launched programs in cache and if a program is launch and there isn't free memory, stuff in the cache starts dropping out!
Now that it got mentioned, I can't say that the system performance seems degraded. There's no sign of swapping, so I guess it's just the disk cache that consumes free RAM. Actually quite smart, coming to think about it!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.