LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2007, 02:07 PM   #1
richinsc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux (20.04)
Posts: 224

Rep: Reputation: 32
Browser Plugins Debian Etch AMD 64


Wondering when there will be a release for the plugins for the AMD64 Arch. I am tired and getting these plugin notices saying there is something that needs installing.. I can't install java because unsupported at moment.. Same with shock wave and other interactive browser add ins..

Anyone found any resources on where these can be obtained?
 
Old 04-25-2007, 02:39 PM   #2
osor
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450

Rep: Reputation: 78
What browser are you talking about? For gecko-based (or anything that uses the NSPAPI for that matter), have you considered using nspluginwrapper with i386 linux plugins?
 
Old 04-25-2007, 02:44 PM   #3
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
gnash replaces flash pretty well, and konqueror doesn't need the java plugin as long as you have Java installed
 
Old 04-25-2007, 03:02 PM   #4
richinsc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux (20.04)
Posts: 224

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Sorry about that, I am using the new IceWeasel but the Mozilla plugins won't work because they are only for i386.
 
Old 04-25-2007, 03:15 PM   #5
osor
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450

Rep: Reputation: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by richinsc
Sorry about that, I am using the new IceWeasel but the Mozilla plugins won't work because they are only for i386.
Which is exactly why you should consider nspluginwrapper
 
Old 04-25-2007, 03:17 PM   #6
richinsc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux (20.04)
Posts: 224

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
I think I will install that rather then waiting for a 64 bit release version... At least then I can watch my flash movies and other flash sites.
 
Old 04-25-2007, 03:21 PM   #7
richinsc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux (20.04)
Posts: 224

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
I hate to put an unstable package on my beloved Stable Dist but I guess it won't hurt to much.... Just will have to remember to remove the unstable from my sources.list after I am done
 
Old 04-25-2007, 11:04 PM   #8
JimBass
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian Sid 2.6.32
Posts: 2,100

Rep: Reputation: 49
You don't need to edit your sources.list at all. You can use a command like this to install from another version:

Code:
apt-get -t unstable install nspluginwrapper
Then there is nothing to change.

Peace,
JimBass
 
Old 04-27-2007, 05:44 PM   #9
richinsc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Utah
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux (20.04)
Posts: 224

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Went to do just that and I was unable to do so without adding to sources.list.. When I ran the suggested command I got:

Code:
BOFH:/home/richinsc# apt-get -t unstable  install nspluginwrapper
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
E: Couldn't find package nspluginwrapper
Upon searching Debian website I found that it says:

Quote:
Where version is the version of Debian you want to use as the main distribution. The versions you can use are stable, testing and unstable. To install packages from another version, then, you must use APT in the following way:

# apt-get -t distribution install package

For that to work, though, you need at least one APT source line in your /etc/apt/sources.list for the distribution you want the package from, and the package must exist on that source.
But don't know if that means the the line as to be active meaning ("#deb http://" or "deb http://")
 
Old 04-27-2007, 06:08 PM   #10
osor
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450

Rep: Reputation: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by richinsc
But don't know if that means the the line as to be active meaning ("#deb http://" or "deb http://")
I’m not positive of this specific case (since I don’t use Debian…), but in general, “#” is used as a comment character in many text configuration files. So removing the “#” is most likely what they mean by making active.
 
Old 04-27-2007, 06:32 PM   #11
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
Post you sources.list, and we'll tell you what to change. But if you can't manage that, I'm not optimistic about you being successful with nspluginwrapper.

Gnash would be easier.
 
Old 04-27-2007, 07:47 PM   #12
osor
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: (H)LFS, Gentoo
Posts: 2,450

Rep: Reputation: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
Gnash would be easier.
If he’s concerned about “stability”, gnash is more like “alpha” and nspluginwrapper is more like “beta” (though gnash definitely wins the freedom argument).
 
Old 04-27-2007, 07:54 PM   #13
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
I don't know ... Gnash works real good for me, and it's made it to Testing. I've heard an upgrade is in the works.

Nspluginwrapper still hasn't gotten out of Unstable.
 
Old 04-28-2007, 10:30 AM   #14
shame
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Debian Sidux - openSUSE
Posts: 261

Rep: Reputation: 30
I've never managed to get gnash working with iceweasel. Ndispluginwrapper works to an extent but I find after a short while of watching falsh movies, on YouTube for example, the movies get replaced by a grey square and don't play so I have to clear out my cache.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Browser Plugins mkhan919 Mandriva 2 01-26-2007 05:58 AM
update Debian testing etch RC1 to etch stable cccc Debian 11 01-08-2007 10:02 PM
mplayer plugins for AMD 64 olva SUSE / openSUSE 3 05-06-2006 03:31 AM
Browser Plugins mmurch01 Linux - Software 18 04-12-2004 11:50 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration