DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Wondering when there will be a release for the plugins for the AMD64 Arch. I am tired and getting these plugin notices saying there is something that needs installing.. I can't install java because unsupported at moment.. Same with shock wave and other interactive browser add ins..
Anyone found any resources on where these can be obtained?
What browser are you talking about? For gecko-based (or anything that uses the NSPAPI for that matter), have you considered using nspluginwrapper with i386 linux plugins?
I hate to put an unstable package on my beloved Stable Dist but I guess it won't hurt to much.... Just will have to remember to remove the unstable from my sources.list after I am done
Upon searching Debian website I found that it says:
Quote:
Where version is the version of Debian you want to use as the main distribution. The versions you can use are stable, testing and unstable. To install packages from another version, then, you must use APT in the following way:
# apt-get -t distribution install package
For that to work, though, you need at least one APT source line in your /etc/apt/sources.list for the distribution you want the package from, and the package must exist on that source.
But don't know if that means the the line as to be active meaning ("#deb http://" or "deb http://")
But don't know if that means the the line as to be active meaning ("#deb http://" or "deb http://")
I’m not positive of this specific case (since I don’t use Debian…), but in general, “#” is used as a comment character in many text configuration files. So removing the “#” is most likely what they mean by making active.
Post you sources.list, and we'll tell you what to change. But if you can't manage that, I'm not optimistic about you being successful with nspluginwrapper.
If he’s concerned about “stability”, gnash is more like “alpha” and nspluginwrapper is more like “beta” (though gnash definitely wins the freedom argument).
I've never managed to get gnash working with iceweasel. Ndispluginwrapper works to an extent but I find after a short while of watching falsh movies, on YouTube for example, the movies get replaced by a grey square and don't play so I have to clear out my cache.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.