LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Debian (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/)
-   -   Adobe Reader did drop us too? (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/debian-26/adobe-reader-did-drop-us-too-4175522119/)

Xeratul 10-14-2014 02:05 PM

Adobe Reader did drop us too?
 
Hi,

Adobe Reader is today of the best PDF reader.
However it seems that they also drop us.

However Android replace Linux. Maybe one day Android will replace Linux too. Who really knows.

Well, so far, we will miss Adobe Reader on Linux.
Maybe it could be possible to run the Android version one on Linux?

Herewith the regular download link from Adobe:
http://get.adobe.com/de/reader/otherversions/

thank you in advance
Regards

smallpond 10-14-2014 02:12 PM

I guess 2 years ago. I never noticed.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-sourc...ns-linux/10418

Xeratul 10-14-2014 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smallpond (Post 5253749)
I guess 2 years ago. I never noticed.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-sourc...ns-linux/10418


It is very pittyful since Adobe Reader is really far far far better than any pdf opensource alternative.

+1 Adobe Reader was lightweight (no dependencies needed).

astrogeek 10-14-2014 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xeratul (Post 5253754)
+1 Adobe Reader was lightweight (no dependencies needed).

That is not a claim I would expect to see for adobe reader!

Among its more unusable and light weight advanced features is the simple search. Have you ever done a simple search in a multi-page document? 100 pages? 1000 pages? Bring lunch! I have always wondered what it could possibly be doing with all those trillions of CPU cycles, matching single characters in what is still just linear memory blocks?! I stand in awe!

Xeratul 10-14-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrogeek (Post 5253760)
That is not a claim I would expect to see for adobe reader!

Among its more unusable and light weight advanced features is the simple search. Have you ever done a simple search in a multi-page document? 100 pages? 1000 pages? Bring lunch! I have always wondered what it could possibly be doing with all those trillions of CPU cycles, matching single characters in what is still just linear memory blocks?! I stand in awe!

Mostly a pdf reader is for me (my personal use) to read in a nice fullscreen and that links fully work.
I never search anything into a pdf.

Well, one cannot say that Adobe Reader was not sufficient for most use/purposes.

frankbell 10-14-2014 09:54 PM

I find Okular far superior to Acrobat Reader, but Linux is about choice.

jefro 10-14-2014 10:06 PM

One more reason to hate them.

ReaperX7 10-14-2014 11:24 PM

Okular is better.

Pastychomper 10-15-2014 03:01 AM

Back in the day I hated PDFs - they were large, unportable (Adobe Reader for DOS stopped at version 1, afaik), and the reader ran like a slug in a treacle mine. Then I dicovered Linux and xpdf, and was soon converted! :)

Admittedly, the more recent Adobe readers for Linux were a lot better, but I still prefer xpdf for raw speed, and Okular for features. I've never used PDF forms, so won't miss them.

dugan 10-15-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xeratul (Post 5253754)
+1 Adobe Reader was lightweight (no dependencies needed).

Uhm, Xeratul, that doesn't mean it was lightweight. It means that the dependencies were included. That's why the download was so large.

As PDF readers go, Calibre's quite good, and the binary distribution of Calibre includes its dependencies too.

Hungry ghost 10-15-2014 02:50 PM

For a long time I was not even aware that there was an official Adobe Reader version for Linux. I've always used the alternative Linux versions and never had issues with them.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.