DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
That is ture, but it's more a matter of whether or not I should have to. I shouldn't have to use Xemacs and therefore, I'd like to resolve this problem. It is a worthy contribution, however. I have thought before of using Xemacs but would rather stick with Emacs (not knowing much about Xemacs).
That's true. So you think the only workaround is using Xemacs instead of Emacs, eh. The frustrating part of this is that I'm positive I have gotten this to work before when using a different distribution.
I just installed Xemacs and it looks nothing like what I'm accustomed to. I seriously doubt this is what emacs& launched when I had it working before. I have to say that I do not like the graphical representation of Xemacs nearly as much as Emacs, as it is much more bloated
The following is a quote from the 'Emacs Manual':
Quote:
If you run Emacs from a shell window under the X Window System, run it in the background with emacs&. This way, Emacs does not tie up the shell window, so you can use that to run other shell commands while Emacs operates its own X windows. You can begin typing Emacs commands as soon as you direct your keyboard input to the Emacs frame.
I believe there are two versions of emacs. One compiled with support for X and the package you need is probably emacs21-nox if you don't need X support at all. Which version of emacs do you have installed? Check in your synaptic package manager and see.
I definitely think you're on to something (thems gold in these here hills).
When searching synaptic for emacs I find the following packages are installed:
emacsen-common
xemacs [...]
It doesn't show emacs21 as being installed but that's because synaptic correlates with apt-get. I installed Emacs from source and Xemacs using apt-get.
I am going to uninstall Emacs and install using apt-get.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.