<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>LinuxQuestions.org - Blogs - ciden</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog.php?u=314443</link>
		<description>LinuxQuestions.org offers a free Linux forum where Linux newbies can ask questions and Linux experts can offer advice. Topics include security, installation, networking and much more.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:19:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>hardware manufacturers should cooperate on a free OS.</title>
			<link>http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog.php?b=810</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 07:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>You have a multitude of PC vendors offering different preinstalled OSes. 
Why cant they just put a small team of developers to snapshot a debian...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>You have a multitude of PC vendors offering different preinstalled OSes.<br />
Why cant they just put a small team of developers to snapshot a debian release and optimise it for their hardware? I am sure that sort of a system would be faster and more reliable than something picked off the net or bought from a store by a person who really doesnt know what is good for himself.<br />
At least it would be more stable than Windoze.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<dc:creator>ciden</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/blog.php?b=810</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
