LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Blogs > rainbowsally
User Name
Password

Notices

Rate this Entry

Quick Note = rpmerizor & retro dev files

Posted 01-25-2012 at 03:31 AM by rainbowsally

I noticed that rpmerizor doesn't include so symlinks in the package. (You have to add them to the spec as "%dir" types if you need them.)

As a result the current rpmerizor is pretty SAFE for retro development packages because it can't overwrite the default libs (*.so with no numeric extension).

However, I've asked eric to consider adding a switch so that we can include the symlinks as per "normal" development packages which usually only contain the *.so symlinks, header files, and perhaps a pkgconfig entry in the lib folder and some docs.

Again, retro development files can munch your system whereas the executables are much less likely to mess you up.

Consider relocating the retro dev files if you actually do need them for some reason.

[See "make-based ...", first in the series in this blog.

We've got an upgrade in the pipes but it's not ready to post yet.]
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 291 Comments 0
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 0

Comments

 

  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Main Menu

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration