LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Blogs > ultimate_linux
User Name
Password

Notices

  1. Old Comment

    speed up your browsing experience

    my router runs linux as well.
    resolving depends on remote servers(as my router has simple recursive DNS), if I query record for the first time.
    my ISP DNS servers are quite laggy that's why I'm off to my own one.
    I also don't like someone watching my dns queries, one more reason to use own recursive server, instead of ISP's or, of course, Google's
    Posted 07-30-2010 at 03:48 AM by Web31337 Web31337 is offline
    Updated 07-30-2010 at 03:50 AM by Web31337
  2. Old Comment

    speed up your browsing experience

    as far as I'm concerned there is a significant improvement in my browsing experience from the time I changed my dns server to google's
    Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:55 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
  3. Old Comment

    speed up your browsing experience

    ping time is more,its okay
    what about the algorithm(software) that converts the URL to ip address.
    google uses the best algorithms and most of its servers run linux,so you can expect good performance.
    who knows your ISP may use a dns server running windows.
    Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:53 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
    Updated 07-29-2010 at 08:56 AM by ultimate_linux
  4. Old Comment

    speed up your browsing experience

    but,opera and firefox are definitely the best browsers.
    browser faceoff
    Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:00 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
  5. Old Comment
    Posted 07-29-2010 at 07:57 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
  6. Old Comment

    speed up your browsing experience

    there is a difference between this:
    Code:
    $ ping 8.8.8.8
    PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=63.6 ms
    64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=64.1 ms
    ^C
    and this:
    Code:
    $ ping 192.168.168.192
    PING 192.168.168.192 (192.168.168.192) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 192.168.168.192: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.144 ms
    64 bytes from 192.168.168.192: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.123 ms
    ^C
    I lose at least 60 msec using your method, how is that faster than having local recursive DNS or one offered by your ISP?
    what of browser I'm quite comfortable with opera & firefox.
    Posted 07-28-2010 at 05:22 PM by Web31337 Web31337 is offline
  7. Old Comment

    alternative to rm command

    There is still no sub for frequent backups and organisation.
    Posted 06-20-2010 at 07:36 PM by 2ck 2ck is offline
  8. Old Comment

    alternative to rm command

    NOTE:the path of trash can also be ~/.local/share/Trash
    Posted 06-19-2010 at 06:45 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
  9. Old Comment

    alternative to rm command

    thank you my dear friend.
    Posted 06-17-2010 at 11:13 AM by ultimate_linux ultimate_linux is offline
  10. Old Comment

    alternative to rm command

    yep, you are right, this did has a great help for recovering!!!!
    Posted 06-16-2010 at 09:00 PM by twwwater twwwater is offline

  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration