| Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
03-28-2005, 07:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 502
Rep:
|
why is X slow to start?
I'm running Arch on my laptop and desktop. There's no problem on the laptop, but I'm having problems with X on the desktop.
It takes a long time for X to start after "startx", and it takes a long time for applications to open once I'm in X. I know this may be a problem with my network, but for now the desktop and laptop are sharing the same router via ethernet. til I can get the wireless working on the laptop, so they have very similar settings except that the ip addresses and modules are different, but I don't think I've missed anything obvious in this regard.
I get a strange warning after shutting down X. This has only been happening (the warning) since I installed fluxbox-devel 0.9.12-2 so I don't know if it's related to the sluggish X behaviour or not (I think not though), but here it is;
*** WARNING: 'Workspace<n>' actions are deprecated! Use 'Workspace <n>' instead
I'm assuming this is related to ~/.fluxbox.init though I'm not sure how.
Any hints for getting X to start quicker and execute programs more quickly once open are much appreciated.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 05:32 AM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,713
|
what kind of processor load is your system under with this? what spec is the machine?
the fluxbox error is totally unrelated btw.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 07:14 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 502
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Can you explain how I should assess the processor load while the X server is starting up?
For a while last night, it seemed to kick into gear, the programs opened quickly and I was able to open X quickly. I couldn't think what might have caused this, but when I rebooted the box, everything was back to its bad normal self again. I'm thinking this is network related as I'm having a hard time using pacman as well. It seems to be always slow - this may be because I don't have good mirrors set up, I'll check that later.
My pertinent specs are as follows
Dell Dimension 8200
Pentium IV 1.8 GHz
256 MB RAM
10/100 PCI fast ethernet NIC (runs off the tulip module)
Connection through DSL via NAT router setup with static IP address assigned by the router.
Cheers and thanks
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 07:19 AM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,713
|
while you run X, run "top" in a console to see where the CPU is being used up, assuming that it is the CPU being whopped by something that's slowing things down. also look at "free" to see how your RAM is being used up.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 05:35 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 502
Original Poster
Rep:
|
ok, I managed to correct the problem and it wasn't too difficult to do.
when setting up /etc/rc.conf, I had given a name to HOSTNAME, but had forgotten to edit /etc/hosts. As a result, X was looking for an invalid hostname. Things seem to be back on track now. At least I got to find out about "free" and "top". Very useful. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 08:19 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Cantong
Distribution: arch
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dcdbutler
when setting up /etc/rc.conf, I had given a name to HOSTNAME, but had forgotten to edit /etc/hosts. As a result, X was looking for an invalid hostname. Thanks!
|
I made the same mistake! now i have solved this problem.thank you!
|
|
|
|
04-21-2005, 09:17 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 502
Original Poster
Rep:
|
That's cool.
Enjoy Arching
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|