ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just installed it yesterday on my notebook (wombat .7 final)
It was a little bit of a tricky installation, but not too bad.. I also had the help of the guys/girls(one female in particular who helped a bunch with my wireless) in FreeNode IRC #archlinux while I was installing...
I learned a lot about rc.conf and whatnot... Its quite fast, and all the downlaod servers seemed to be quite fast as well.. I have a 4Mbit Cable conection and I was downloading the initial updates at about 445K/s (~3.5Mb)
It's nice and quick, I like all the little changes with the archlinux brandings for the splash screens and whatnot..
Also, the colors in the console are really great... pacman is pretty nice...
It doesn't include a bunch of stuff by default, even choosing everything off the CD... but it does include xine and mplayer.. which is *UBER* cool in itself... I really wish the i586 was working because I would love to stick it on my old Pentium MMX lappy...
I am going to try and make time to do a distro review for it.. after a couple more days of using it...
Kind of reminds me of slackware with good (native)package management... of course, it's not as old as slack or anything.. but that's kind of what is feels like...
I really recommend checking it out... I tried to install it with .6 a while back without success, maybe I was still too much of a newbie.. or maybe something else.. either way.. I'm pretty happy with it..
hey halo14,
i was trying arch the other day, but i realised my dl speed was at the rate of 4 to 10kb/s, that is really slow and i lost my patience while waiting for xorg to dl . But now seeing you can get 400kb/s, my interest returns. Care to tell me which mirriors did you use for pacman? I still have my 0.7 wombat cd, want to use it for my desktop that has a Compaq WL215 usb wireless adapter, you think this thing will work?
BTW, I have paid for a 180kb/s cable, so i expect to reach that speed, not 4 to 10.
um.. I don't remember for sure what mirrors I was using.. I just commented down a few mirrors.. although.. I am near Chicago and you are near the equator.. so you would not want to use the same mirror as myself anyways.. You might have just hit it at a bad time.. when I downloaded something (can't remember what it was) the downloads were so slow that it was failing repeatedly.. then I tried about an hour and a half later, and got fantastic speeds..
I would say to give it another shot.. If you have more than one PC, check out #archlinux on IRC for help while installing.. good luck
I will try our your recommendations. I dint use netselect, but i tried all of the mirrors and all of them are slow. I reinstall arch last night and it is the same problem....slow. My xorg dl just stalled half way after 3 small files being downloaded. The dl speed was at a paltry 0.3kb/s
I tried arch because of it's famed pacman and optimised binary. As I was a gentoo user, i got a liitle tired with the long compile, so trying out arch now. But never occurs to me arch ftp is so slow, it is just like having gentoo again, but with a twist.
Now i am in the office and I am tersting the dl by randomly dowloading some big files from the same mirrors i used last night at home, most of them can hit a hundred or more kb/s. Hmm, looks like it's my network set up problem rather than mirror upload speed then.....
Anyway I can find out? My current prime suspect is my nameserver, I just use the same nameserver ip i picked up from my debian box(another pc) and insert the same ip onto arch's resolv.conf.
Last edited by newinlinux; 02-23-2005 at 08:27 PM.
sorry to report that I didnt make it in arch slow dl problem. I just lost my cool(or mind?) last night and re install slackware 10.1. I will spend more time googling b4 i put that wombat back onto the cdrom again.
Thanks for your patience and assistance, LQ is a great place to ask questions because folks like you are always there to help out.
cheers.
PSJ P@CkMaN, yes, i'm on a wireless router. And i use a lan cable during the set up.
Last edited by newinlinux; 02-24-2005 at 11:54 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.