LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2005, 08:47 PM   #1
jery_wang2002
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
GNUCash


Hi All,

I have been using:

Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu 5.04, Suse 9.3, FreeBSD (Gnome had problem with Gnome theme), Gentoo 2005.0 (never had success installing after spending 3 whole days of not be able to find svgalib solution on deep inside forum), I finally try Arch Linux.

So far I am quite happy with:
- the latest applications are available and it continuously updating, unlike Ubuntu where after a release it stops updating with the latest.
- it's fast unlike Suse 9.3 where the first click to Gnome menu takes 1 - 2 seconds, although Arch is much faster but it is still takes sometime. Subsequent click is very fast. FreeBSD does not show 'first click slow' syndrome and it is very fast/responsive.
- availability of latest binary packages. I am done with source compiling in Gentoo, I don't want to touch it anymore. The only GRP available are old in Gentoo. FreeBSD is not too bad since packages are quite latest although the latest (current) still needs to compile.

I find that Gnucash is not in the packages and there was some effort to build it (hxxx://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=5751). I am that clear with that thread.

Could someone help me gives some pointers/links. I want to build this Gnucash for Archlinux.

-------------------
Sidetrack:

I find that Archlinux is very promising distro. Why?

Fedora Core 3 and 4 is so pathetic with up2date. We need yum to do the update. In addition, we need dag rpm etc. to get other packages esp. mp3.

Suse 9.3 is not that fast.

Slackware, many are not latest.

Ubuntu, I think is among the best, hard to find weaknesses. The only perceived weakness is that no software upgrade after release (only security fixes). But I think this is necessary evil to keep the system stable. I have yet to see Archlinux in keeping stability with the latest/greatest updates.


FreeBSD is very fast and very responsive. In Suse, I ftp-ed (local LAN) Gigabytes zip file and the network bandwidth is erractic and never reach 60% continues/steady utilization on 100BaseT. FreeBSD uses about 90% 'STEADY' network utilization on this 100BaseT (~9-10Mbytes/s). Now that is really something.

Just sharing my experience and may not necessary applicable to other users.

Cheers,
Jerry Wang
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GnuCash Zero-0-Effect Linux - Software 1 10-29-2005 06:11 AM
gnucash juyce Linux - Software 1 09-18-2005 02:44 PM
gnucash cphase Slackware 11 04-13-2005 05:46 PM
gnucash package! denning Slackware 5 03-11-2005 03:26 PM
who uses gnucash? pekuekfir Linux - General 1 02-27-2002 09:36 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration