LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2005, 01:12 AM   #1
DesyphER
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: MDK 10.1
Posts: 110

Rep: Reputation: 15
Does archlinux have a GUI installer?


Does archlinux have a GUI installer?
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 02-26-2005, 02:48 AM   #2
colnago
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
With arch it is a low-res gui type of thing. You select a few options and it holds your hand as you go hrough each. I think 6 options in all, like 'select packages', 'configure system', 'select kernel', 'install bootloader', and a few others. Most of it is pretty straight forward. The scary part fro some is the 'confiugure system' part where you edit fstab, lilo.conf, rc.conf, hosts. the only thing you really need to do is make sure the bootloader is ok (basic part done automatically) and installed and that the hosts file has an entry for the local host name chosen in rc.conf. To get the network and sound going you can configure and load modules in rc.conf too. You need to know a little about linux configuration. Once installed, pacman can be used to get kde, gnome, or xfce. I think it comes with kde, but yoiu need to select it in 'install packages' or whatever.
 
Old 02-26-2005, 03:44 AM   #3
DesyphER
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: MDK 10.1
Posts: 110

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Sounds too hard for me. What about slack does that have a simple GUI installer?
 
Old 02-26-2005, 08:17 AM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
Slackware does not have a GUI installer, but the installation is very easy
 
Old 02-26-2005, 09:53 AM   #5
Cron
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: FreeBSD, Arch, Ubuntu
Posts: 145

Rep: Reputation: 15
GUI is not always simple... But Slackware installer is much simpler than Archlinux.
In Arch partitioning part is very anoying.
 
Old 02-26-2005, 10:01 AM   #6
caladbolg
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Mandrake 10.x, Fedora Core 3, Archlinux 0.7, Ubuntu 5.04
Posts: 303

Rep: Reputation: 31
If you want GUI's use distros like Fedora, Mandrake, and SuSE.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-26-2005, 05:55 PM   #7
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 56
Arch has a curses interface which is pretty basic but the partitioning bit might take a few goes for it to click what you're actually doing there Isn't stated as clearly as it might be.
 
Old 02-26-2005, 07:34 PM   #8
dcdbutler
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 502

Rep: Reputation: 30
I partitioned before installation which made it very easy. you can use the knoppix live cd for this.

hotplug is waaaay too slow to fire up, but I'm still a bit confused as to which modules to put in rc.conf. Is there some easy way to find out which module does what exactly and whether it would be of general benefit to have them in rc.conf? It would be pointless to have stuff I don't need starting up.
 
Old 02-28-2005, 02:42 AM   #9
DesyphER
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: MDK 10.1
Posts: 110

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Yeah im still a linux newbie so im sticking with GUI distros till i can learn a bit more.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 11:53 AM   #10
lumpfish
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Arch Linux 0.7
Posts: 38

Rep: Reputation: 15
DesyphER - I would make the jump to either Slack or Arch if I were you. Prior to using Slack I, like you, spent most of my time with "GUI distros"... problem is I didn't learn squat from them. When I moved to slack I encountered several small problems/anoyances, however, trolling around the boards here I found answers to almost everything. When I couldn't find an answer, I just posted a question and invariably was able to work my way through everything with the help of the great people here.

I have since moved on to Arch and love it.... but Slack, in my opinion, is a great learning distro as everything is set up as it should be and the amount of support you can find on the boards here is awesome. I learned more in 1 month of using Slack than I did in the previous year of using Mandrake.

Confront your fears - you may come to discover they were unfounded.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 06:29 PM   #11
caladbolg
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Mandrake 10.x, Fedora Core 3, Archlinux 0.7, Ubuntu 5.04
Posts: 303

Rep: Reputation: 31
Not to mention sometimes you cant run GUI distros on old machines when you want to run a webserver or anything. Its a nice feeling when things work too
 
Old 03-02-2005, 05:42 PM   #12
electronique
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Menomonie, WI
Distribution: SuSE 9.2, Slackware Current, Arch Linux 0.7
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 15
Arch Installer

The Arch installer is very similar to the slackware installer aside from the fact that for partitioning you are actually dumped in cfdisk. Personally I like this option more that most installers partitioning schemes... it gives you complete control... just remember that Arch uses udev (not devfs) by default so the disks aren't hda per say... they are /dev/discs/disc0/part1... etc. Another difference is that you have to manually edit a few configuration files... nothing extremely difficult... if you've "looked under the hood" of any linux before the Arch wiki does a great job of explaining things and making some suggestions for values. All in all arch is great for somone looking for "Gentoo without all that compiling" or "Slackware with [ACTUAL] package management" I like it so far... there are a few bugs... but it is great for a distro that is on version 0.7... I can't wait until version 1!!!!
 
Old 01-11-2014, 09:12 PM   #13
JeffStory
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2014
Location: Shelton, Wa, USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Authentic Arch Linux GUI Installer

Thought you may find this interesting. A GUI installer project for authentic Arch Linux. The FU-Arch (for users Arch) project.

http://www.jeffstory.org/wordpress/

Last edited by JeffStory; 01-14-2014 at 05:26 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-11-2014, 09:30 PM   #14
Germany_chris
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 616

Rep: Reputation: 227Reputation: 227Reputation: 227
and when you didn't learn anything getting it installed how do you propose the new morons you just created fix something when it breaks?

If you're going to necro a 9 yo thread maybe it should be for something that helps the community

Last edited by Germany_chris; 01-11-2014 at 09:32 PM.
 
Old 01-11-2014, 10:12 PM   #15
JeffStory
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2014
Location: Shelton, Wa, USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Germany_chris View Post
and when you didn't learn anything getting it installed how do you propose the new morons you just created fix something when it breaks?

If you're going to necro a 9 yo thread maybe it should be for something that helps the community
Lol .... By all means then you should stay with your Arch derived distro. Nothing wrong with that. Simply don't use my GUI installer.

As for your other comments, I have used the real Arch Linux for 5 years pretty much exclusively. Long before there were any Arch based easy to install derivatives like you use.

What I learned is there is a demand for something to bridge the gap between an authentic Arch, and the current derivatives. The GUI installer is going to install a base Arch install. Not a full GUI desktop, so you see Genius_chris, you would still need to learn how to use the command line to install everything else, and configure it.
I think Arch is one of the best distros out there, I just can't align myself with the “the Arch way, principles, and philosophy” part of the requirement.

You're sounding like you want to be kinda elitist, but don't you actually have to be able to use Arch to exhibit that behavior?

As for being useful, I'm offering to fund this project. What have you done other that your feeble attempt to be elitist?

Last edited by JeffStory; 01-13-2014 at 05:32 PM. Reason: replace "terminal" with "command line"
 
2 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debian GUI Installer is OUT SlackerLX Debian 2 11-06-2005 02:02 PM
gui mozilla-installer in debian basanta Linux - General 0 11-25-2004 05:18 AM
What Does The UT2004 Installer Do Behind The Fancy GUI Installer? Tsuroerusu Linux - Games 2 09-09-2004 03:37 PM
Mandrake GUI Installer Remush Mandriva 2 04-23-2004 11:24 PM
root and installing with gui installer LinFreak! Linux - General 6 11-22-2003 06:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration