LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2012, 06:54 AM   #1
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
Arch: update = break?


Is it just me, or is it becoming more common for an Arch update to cause some kind of issue?

My last update was maybe 2 months ago, and did not cause any issues. This time (yesterday), I lost the GUI completely. At first, it just seemed that user switching was broken, but after reboot, I had no Desktop---just a blue screen.

What's different on this one is that the website has no warnings---only the bit about transitioning to systemd (but no indication that it would be forced on the user during an upgrade.
 
Old 11-21-2012, 08:38 AM   #2
Snark1994
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Wales, UK
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,632
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345
I think it's just the systemd transition. I had a horrible time getting polkit to work again after the switch... But I think (hope) it'll all settle down after everything's running with systemd. Mind you, I tend to update every day, which may mean things are less likely to break (or rather, break in a big way, because you have time to fix each of the small issues individually).
 
Old 11-22-2012, 05:24 PM   #3
teckk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 1,762

Rep: Reputation: 192Reputation: 192
I never go more than a week on Arch without upgrading. Usually 2 or 3 days. There have been a few user actions required for updating in the last few months. 2 months of updates may give you a lot to do.
They are upgrading the kernel 2 times a week some weeks. File roller has been updated 3 times in the last 3 weeks for the same version. Nouveau has been updated several times, libwebkit 2 times I think. Guess that's why they called it a rolling release.
Arch's front page, wiki, and forums are pretty good about keeping a user in the know.
I never update without reading the front page first, then understanding the suggestions posted.

I think that I read that xinitrc no longer launches gnome or XFCE. (systemd)
 
Old 11-22-2012, 05:30 PM   #4
teckk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 1,762

Rep: Reputation: 192Reputation: 192
Ya, It talks about it in the systemd guide

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php..._under_systemd

Code:
Note: As of 2012-10-30, ConsoleKit has been replaced by systemd-logind as the default mechanism to login to the DE.
Running DEs under systemd

Code:
To enable graphical login, run your preferred Display Manager daemon (e.g. KDM). At the moment, service files exist for GDM, KDM, SLiM, XDM, LXDM and LightDM.
# systemctl enable kdm
This should work out of the box. If not, you might have a default.target set manually or from a older install:
# ls -l /etc/systemd/system/default.target
/etc/systemd/system/default.target -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/graphical.target
etc.................
 
Old 11-22-2012, 05:45 PM   #5
Siljrath
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: the internet
Distribution: sid, slack, gentoo, witch, bedrock, etc
Posts: 160

Rep: Reputation: 42
"is it becoming more common for an Arch update to cause some kind of issue?"

i've noticed this too. to the point that i've ditched my parabola install, and am leaving my arch install dormant, until i decide to get rid of it (rarely used that one anyway).

maybe if i ever return to arch (maybe once the dust settles after the recent turbulence...), i'll write an update script that will show me the frontpage every time before updating.
... not that i expect this to be an effective vaccination against update=break, since when my parabola install died, i had followed the instructions to the letter, so i could avoid what then happened anyway.

yeah, arch is dead to me for now. happier dealing with slackware and debian, and much happier dealing with gentoo, where: the system is far less vulnerable to failing, making it much more suitable for a mission-crittical-use production environment; you're more informed and empowered with tools to deal with any issues.

having said that, much respect to arch. i'm still very glad it exists.
 
Old 11-23-2012, 04:11 PM   #6
-cyrus-
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Distribution: CentOS (Server), Arch (Laptop)
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siljrath View Post
"yeah, arch is dead to me for now. happier dealing with slackware and debian, and much happier dealing with gentoo, where: the system is far less vulnerable to failing, making it much more suitable for a mission-crittical-use production environment; you're more informed and empowered with tools to deal with any issues.
I have to disagree there. Arch keeps you very well informed with each update and change taking place, informing you of the manual intervention required to deal with these changes.

If you call your system 'mission critical' the key is to update often after checking the announcements at the Arch website to figure out if any manual intervention is required.

As such, I have had absolutely no problem keeping up with the Arch updates and systemd is now the default init system on my installation.
 
Old 11-23-2012, 07:41 PM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
I readily concede that things would be better if I were to update monthly instead of every 3-6 months. The difference this time was that I could not go to the website and find the key issue that caused the system to break. I was always able to do that in the past.

All this aside, I'm finishing up a fresh install--systemd and all--we'll see how it goes.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why does Arch break if pacman tracks dependencies? Mr. Alex Arch 4 11-22-2012 05:59 PM
Arch Linux Update Error foreverkdy1 Linux - Newbie 6 10-30-2011 11:20 AM
VirtualBox broken after kernel update in Arch Linux MTK358 Linux - Software 10 09-06-2010 07:51 PM
[SOLVED] Arch Linux won't update! MTK358 Linux - General 3 08-14-2010 07:38 PM
Arch Linux update failed! MTK358 Linux - General 6 07-04-2010 07:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration