LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2004, 11:40 PM   #1
AGilley007
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Eden, NC
Distribution: Various
Posts: 267

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arch


I herd it was hard to install. Is it? I have Slackware now. Also is this a fairly good distro I have herd good things.
 
Old 07-15-2004, 03:30 AM   #2
MasterC
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
Moving to Distributions - Arch

Cool
 
Old 07-15-2004, 05:16 AM   #3
=X=
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
if you can install slack, you can install arch as well... just follow the documentation

I'm using it practically since the beginning of arch, and I'd never go back to another distro (and I've used about any other distro in the past) so yes, it's a 'fairly' good distribution
 
Old 07-15-2004, 05:11 PM   #4
Manini
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: L.A.
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
This is an amazing distro! I just began using it a few weeks ago, and I must say I absolutely love it. If you read the documentation , you should be fine on the install. It's the fastest distro I've seen yet. Fast install, fast boot, fast everything. It's optimized for i686. Give it a try, you'll be glad you did
 
Old 07-16-2004, 04:17 PM   #5
colnago
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
It is very good.

Since some of the updates available online indicate it, I think the 0.7 "Wombat" release will be out in a very short time. The base install is fairly light so there is no need to wait for 0.7, you can use the pacman utility to update to the new release at any time.

As I said in the other post, it is only medium-hard to install. Not a one-choice install like lindows, but nothing like Gentoo. Maybe a little more demanding than the present Slackware install. It takes a little time (mostly because it does not have kde, xorg, etc on the CD, you need to use pacman to install it over the net), but still can be done in an hour or two if you have cable/dsl or better.

The packages are all in tar.gz format, so if you want to install more than once, you can burn the /var/cache/pacman/pkg dir onto cd (or 2) and then copy it back on the next install to save download time. Packman will find the packages there automatically,
 
Old 07-25-2004, 11:16 AM   #6
rntm
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
Does that mean installing arch without Inet access is senseless? Because I have a 0.4 cd lying around somewhere.
 
Old 07-25-2004, 01:36 PM   #7
colnago
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
Arch 0.6 is the current one, and 0.7 will be out very soon. It is very limiting not to have internet access, unless you are a cli only person.

I installed on a computer that only has modem access, but I did so by burning the contents of the local pacman cache from an up-to-date arch install to cd and then just copying the cd to the cache of the new install. It all fit on 2 cds.
 
Old 07-25-2004, 08:06 PM   #8
wr3kt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Well if you do an ftp install, you'll be showing Arch .7
Just fyi.

But anway...I do love this distro. It was wierd at first, but after I got use to it, I haven't had any problems.
 
Old 07-26-2004, 04:52 PM   #9
AGilley007
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Eden, NC
Distribution: Various
Posts: 267

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks I am downloading it now 68% done I hope I can install it ok.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 04:07 PM   #10
AGilley007
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Eden, NC
Distribution: Various
Posts: 267

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Oh well it did not go so good it froze on the install waited for 2 days never moved so I just might have to take the time for gentoo.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 04:31 PM   #11
xirus
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
why don't you go ask help on the arch forums or on irc?
 
Old 07-30-2004, 10:11 AM   #12
AGilley007
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Eden, NC
Distribution: Various
Posts: 267

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I did but nonthing they asked me to do seemed to help it kept freezing on that one part.
 
Old 07-30-2004, 03:27 PM   #13
bosewicht
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Honolulu, HI
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,380

Rep: Reputation: 47
at what part did it keep freezing?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arch box isn't seen arcturus Arch 1 06-07-2005 12:11 AM
I installed Arch! ArchIsGood Arch 3 05-30-2004 09:55 AM
MenuMaker in Arch Dead Parrot Arch 5 03-15-2004 04:46 PM
What is Arch like? iq_n0ob Arch 5 12-03-2003 03:34 PM
Arch .6? gsibble Arch 1 11-24-2003 10:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration