LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2015. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 10th.


Notices


View Poll Results: Video Media Player Application of the Year
Dragon Player 4 1.02%
DVD-Player (XBMC) 2 0.51%
FFplay 0 0%
kaffeine 4 1.02%
Miro 1 0.25%
mplayer 68 17.30%
mplayer2 12 3.05%
mpv 28 7.12%
Parole 3 0.76%
Totem 7 1.78%
VLC 260 66.16%
xine 4 1.02%
Voters: 393. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2016, 12:35 PM   #31
bassmadrigal
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Newport News, VA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,070

Rep: Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457

Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho View Post
you dudes & duderinas really have to check out mpv again.
if your distro supports a recent version (say, 0.8 or larger).
it plays everything you throw at it even youtube videos (just like mplayer and vlc).
but,

unlike mplayer, it has a rudimentary GUI that is really enough for daily use.

unlike vlc, it is truly lightweight and not dependent on any toolkit.
(vlc has often proven a tad heavy on my dated hardware)

it's mplayer mark 2, really (and yes, i know there's mplayer2, but that's a half-hearted attempt compared to mpv).
cruft removed, all improved...

on linux, it is the media player (yeah i know, i'm a fanboi).
and it's only 3 letters.

and of course there's nothing wrong with using a frontend like smplayer.
I continue to use mplayer because it is included with my distro and it's easy to recompile if I need additional features. mpv has several additional required dependencies that I would need to compile before I can get mpv itself. It is on my list to check, but honestly, I see no issues with mplayer that mpv could improve. I'm sure there's substantial improvements, but I don't know if it'll be anything I'd actually notice with my usage.
 
Old 01-12-2016, 08:32 AM   #32
s.verma
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Distribution: Debian Sid, Gentoo, Arch, Debian
Posts: 169
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 24
vlc and xine both are my favourites, but I found xine better for playing many files flawlessly in which vlc got stuck sometimes.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 01:29 AM   #33
msdobrescu
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 3
SMPlayer would be a nice choice too.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 08:53 AM   #34
bassmadrigal
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Newport News, VA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,070

Rep: Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457
Quote:
Originally Posted by msdobrescu View Post
SMPlayer would be a nice choice too.
If you read through the comments, you'd see that smplayer is left off because it is just a frontend for mplayer or mpv. It is not a player, but takes mplayer/mpv output and puts a fancy GUI around it.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 06:11 PM   #35
bobbib
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2015
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 3
Lightbulb

Quote:
mplayer2
BTW, AFAIK, it's dead.
One should use either mpv or original mplayer instead.

Last edited by bobbib; 01-15-2016 at 06:13 PM.
 
Old 01-15-2016, 07:54 PM   #36
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian & Fedora mostly
Posts: 2,034

Rep: Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540Reputation: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbib View Post
BTW, AFAIK, it's dead.
One should use either mpv or original mplayer instead.
Sadly, yes. Really liked mplayer2, reason I've made the jump to mpv. Mplayer1 just behaves WEIRD IMO.
 
Old 01-16-2016, 02:28 AM   #37
msdobrescu
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
If you read through the comments, you'd see that smplayer is left off because it is just a frontend for mplayer or mpv. It is not a player, but takes mplayer/mpv output and puts a fancy GUI around it.
Right, but that GUI makes the difference for me.
 
Old 01-16-2016, 04:25 PM   #38
bassmadrigal
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Newport News, VA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,070

Rep: Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457
Quote:
Originally Posted by msdobrescu View Post
Right, but that GUI makes the difference for me.
I agree that smplayer makes mplayer/mpv much nicer, but it still isn't a video media player. It's a shell for mplayer/mpv, which is the real video player.

The body on a car looks nice, but it is just aesthetics. The real workhorse is the engine/drivetrain.
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:25 PM   #39
wagscat123
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland-Pennsylvania border, USA
Distribution: openSUSE 13.2, 42.1, and 42.2, OS X 10.10, Ubuntu 16.04, and Linux Mint 17.3
Posts: 545
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 58
VLC is kinda as ugly and clunky as Windows Media Player 6, but it always gets the job done.
 
Old 01-17-2016, 01:13 PM   #40
bloody
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Berlin
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 172

Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
I agree that smplayer makes mplayer/mpv much nicer, but it still isn't a video media player. It's a shell for mplayer/mpv, which is the real video player.

The body on a car looks nice, but it is just aesthetics. The real workhorse is the engine/drivetrain.
Well, it still takes alot of work and inspiration to design and build a great-looking car body. Same with the "just aesthetics" smplayer frontend. Surely means lots of work to write such a software, and it's very nicely done. So i'd say that mplayer is only half the cake.
 
Old 01-17-2016, 03:08 PM   #41
bassmadrigal
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Newport News, VA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,070

Rep: Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457Reputation: 1457
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloody View Post
Well, it still takes alot of work and inspiration to design and build a great-looking car body. Same with the "just aesthetics" smplayer frontend. Surely means lots of work to write such a software, and it's very nicely done. So i'd say that mplayer is only half the cake.
Don't get me wrong. I love smplayer and have used it for almost a decade (I know I used it at least in 2008... maybe earlier) and I've used it on both Windows and Linux. I'm not trying to minimize the work that has gone into smplayer but a GUI to mplayer is still not a video media player. You can get the video to play the exact same way if you copy the mplayer command that smplayer uses to play the video... you just don't get the fancy GUI.

The fact is, smplayer is an amazing frontend for mplayer/mpv, but that doesn't make it a video media player. Maybe if they somehow took the mplayer/mpv code and incorporated it into their app so when you play a video file, it is only calling smplayer, but right now, if you play a video file, smplayer will call either mplayer or mpv to actually play the file while just putting a fancy border (that do some great things) around the actual player.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-18-2016, 08:12 PM   #42
johnniedoo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT17 Mate, Cinnamon , UBUNTU14.04LTS LiveCD trials
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I picked vlc by elimination. I like mplayer and mplayer2 as well as mpv but had small but inconvenient or pesky trouble. I find that VLC works despite its looks or clunky reputation. I fall back to it often enough that I had to elevate its overall score-but I did not use 3 of the options in the poll.
I am embarrassingly offering this qualification to my choice.I probably should have not voted rather than offer an asterisk vote.
 
Old 02-01-2016, 05:45 PM   #43
MrRtd
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
I vote for QMPlay2.
 
Old 02-01-2016, 07:12 PM   #44
fredsua
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Fluendo Media Player

Could Fluendo Player be added to the list?
 
Old 02-01-2016, 07:33 PM   #45
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=14, FreeBSD_10{.0|.1|.2}
Posts: 3,879
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998Reputation: 1998
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredsua View Post
Could Fluendo Player be added to the list?
I had never heard of Fluendo so decided to have a look...

As far as I can tell it is proprietary only, and seems to front gstreamer as its "open" poster child.

I do not know if that would affect its inclusion here, but if you use it or are affiliated with it, could you provide a little more info.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 39 03-05-2015 08:05 PM
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 48 02-08-2012 11:47 PM
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 50 03-24-2010 06:52 AM
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 59 04-28-2008 12:50 AM
Video Media Player Application of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 112 08-26-2007 10:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration