LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2015. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 10th.


Notices


View Poll Results: Browser of the Year
Chrome 67 12.67%
Chromium 45 8.51%
Conkeror 0 0%
Dillo 1 0.19%
dwb 1 0.19%
Epiphany 1 0.19%
Firefox 293 55.39%
Iceweasel 31 5.86%
Konqueror 1 0.19%
links/elinks 2 0.38%
Luakit 1 0.19%
lynx 3 0.57%
Midori 6 1.13%
NetRider 0 0%
Opera 14 2.65%
Otter Browser 4 0.76%
PaleMoon 18 3.40%
QupZilla 8 1.51%
rekonq 1 0.19%
SeaMonkey 26 4.91%
Uzbl 3 0.57%
w3m 2 0.38%
Iridium 1 0.19%
Voters: 529. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2016, 03:19 PM   #136
ugjka
Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Latvia
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, ChakraOS
Posts: 262
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 180Reputation: 180

I just installed qupzilla-webengine which uses the blink engine. Very imressed so far. If there are no major showstopper I think I'm ditching google-chrome for good
 
Old 04-02-2016, 05:30 PM   #137
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib." FreeBSD.
Posts: 3,225
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686
Doesn't "Blink" = "Chromium"?
 
Old 04-03-2016, 03:20 AM   #138
ugjka
Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Latvia
Distribution: Arch, CentOS, ChakraOS
Posts: 262
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 180Reputation: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Doesn't "Blink" = "Chromium"?
Yes it blink but also no, chromium is gtk based, webengine in qt5. Also there are no "Googly" stuff in webengine. It doesn't track you

https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine

From my personal testing qupzilla-webengine uses signifanctly less ram then google-chrome. I like it much better
 
Old 04-03-2016, 06:59 PM   #139
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib." FreeBSD.
Posts: 3,225
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686Reputation: 686
Quote:
Originally Posted by ugjka View Post
Yes it blink but also no, chromium is gtk based, webengine in qt5. Also there are no "Googly" stuff in webengine. It doesn't track you

https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine

From my personal testing qupzilla-webengine uses signifanctly less ram then google-chrome. I like it much better

Quote:
QupZilla 2.0.0 is now available. This is a new major version of QupZilla and also brings great changes. The biggest change is the switch of rendering engine, from old and unmaintained QtWebKit to shiny new QtWebEngine!

QtWebEngine is using Chromium to render web pages which brings much better compatibility with web pages and also great stability (thanks to multi-process architecture).

There are big changes (both architecture and API-wise) between QtWebKit and QtWebEngine, so porting of QupZilla took some time. There are also still features from QtWebKit not available in QtWebEngine, so some QupZilla features may not be available in new release. Those missing features will come back in next releases of QupZilla and QtWebEngine.

QupZilla now depends on latest Qt release (Qt 5.6) to be able to use all QtWebEngine features.

QupZilla is now available in repositories of all major distributions. From now on, I will stop providing Linux builds. This also means that my Ubuntu PPA will not get any new releases. I will still provide Windows builds.
http://blog.qupzilla.com/2016/03/qup...webengine.html
 
Old 04-05-2016, 02:27 AM   #140
ondoho
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,176

Rep: Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835Reputation: 835
it seems more and more browser developers just use chromium(s engine) as a base.
i wonder what that entails for the whole becoming-a-google-victim topic.

i am right now trying out https://www.brave.com - can't really say anything yet, haven't seen any technical pages (like what engine it uses), and i have difficulty installing it on arch, but it is open source and looks promising enough.
 
Old 04-05-2016, 01:10 PM   #141
JWJones
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Cascadia
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 276Reputation: 276Reputation: 276
^ Brave uses Chromium as base, as well (#5):

https://www.brave.com/FAQ.html
 
Old 05-31-2016, 12:53 PM   #142
bamunds
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Mounds View MN
Distribution: Slackware64-current-Multilib-WINE
Posts: 221

Rep: Reputation: 57
Wikipedia has a page for browser engines, which is more important than the browser IMHO because I want to support open source development. There are fewer OSS browser layout engines than most think. Basically every browser is becoming a victim of Google and Alphabet Inc, since they have development control of Chromium/Blink/WebEngine. From the browser engine page I have searched for a browser which isn't WebEngine/Blink/Chromium or Gecko based. This is what I've found.

Webkit layout engines:
Almost all browsers using WebKit have announced they are moving to WebEngine (Qupzilla/Dooble/Web). GNOME has announced it will be dropping GtkHTML for WebEngine. QT has stated they will be engaging with WebEngine on next generation of QT applications and slowly ending WebKit support. Mozilla Foundation has stated they plan to incorporate WebEngine into Servo (their new layout engine). I expect SeaMonkey and Firefox will sooner than later be using WebEngine within the next 18 months, now that Servo is under very heavy development.

What about other layout engines:
NetSurf, built on Hubbub, is interesting but doesn't play well with many of the sites that I regularly visit.
Dillo is basic HTML and CSS and doesn't work for the many sites that I visit.
Konqueror by KDE, who developed KHTML and later integrated Apple's WebKit fork of KHTML, doesn't yet say if Konqueror will use WebEngine or if more KHTML development will be restarted to address HTML5 and CSS3 developments. Konqueror is still a great browser, but I'm waiting for their decision, which might not ever be stated.

So in the meantime I have moved to Pale Moon with the Goanna engine, which was forked from Gecko. It uses many Mozilla plugins and supports KeePass integration. I works extremely well for my needs. Konqueror is my back-up. Since my Linux flavor is Slackware I do have access to Firefox and SeaMonkey, but they are heavily restricted and the callback functions have been killed with a specialize USER.JS file. Hope this helps anyone looking to stay independent and not engendered to corporate powers.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Browser of the Year jeremy 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 78 02-16-2014 08:32 AM
Browser of the Year jeremy 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 193 06-10-2011 11:26 AM
Browser of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 133 05-03-2008 10:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration