LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2014. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 3rd.


Notices


View Poll Results: Window Manager of the Year
awesome 10 2.48%
bspwm 2 0.50%
Compiz 32 7.92%
dwm 9 2.23%
Enlightenment 29 7.18%
Fluxbox 48 11.88%
FVWM 12 2.97%
herbstluftwm 3 0.74%
i3 24 5.94%
IceWM 16 3.96%
JWM 4 0.99%
KWin 82 20.30%
Marco 5 1.24%
MetaCity 4 0.99%
Mutter 5 1.24%
Notion 0 0%
Openbox 53 13.12%
Ratpoison 1 0.25%
Sawfish 3 0.74%
spectrwm 4 0.99%
twm 7 1.73%
Window Maker 6 1.49%
wmii 0 0%
xfwm4 38 9.41%
xmonad 3 0.74%
Muffin 2 0.50%
StumpWM 2 0.50%
Voters: 404. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-18-2014, 12:53 PM   #16
Soderlund
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 185

Rep: Reputation: 81

The Window Manager!

Its greatest strength is that it's always available.
 
Old 12-18-2014, 01:34 PM   #17
bernardofpc
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 1
Awesome

I've used blackbox for a long time, and this year I tried awesome. And it ran as fast (and I also have a Pentium 4 desktop with 512 Mb), had equivalent configuration options (perhaps superior, but I still don't use it) and eventually used less RAM because of simpler xcb bindings (my guess here). Won me.
 
Old 12-18-2014, 01:52 PM   #18
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,130
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825Reputation: 4825
Quote:
Originally Posted by steeladept View Post
I will abstain from this category. I am not sure I understand the difference between the desktop environment and a windows manager.
A WM does not much more than decorating and displaying windows and react to input events. A DE on the other hand bundles a WM with other useful software for everyday life, like text editors, virtual terminals and calculators, for example. In this way, Openbox, Fluxbox, ... are WMs, while GNOME, MATE, KDE, XFCE, ... are desktop environments. A bit in the gray zone are Enlightenment, which bundles a few applications, but claims to be a WM, and LXDE/LXQt, which have all the bundled software, but no own window manager.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-18-2014, 10:52 PM   #19
Mik3e
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Marco gets the job done without distractions.
 
Old 12-18-2014, 11:11 PM   #20
dunne
Member
 
Registered: May 2014
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 36
lwm


It's a shame that lwm isn't in the list. http://www.jfc.org.uk/software/lwm.html
 
Old 12-19-2014, 12:47 PM   #21
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 415

Rep: Reputation: 82
I've tried nearly all of them on the list more than a few times, but keep returning to Openbox.
 
Old 12-20-2014, 02:25 AM   #22
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: JULinux 12 & 10, Ubuntu Christian 12.04
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like to use Openbox with KDE. It's more lightweight than the default Kwin.
 
Old 12-20-2014, 02:59 AM   #23
rebeka_catalina
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2014
Location: Berlin
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
spectrwm is my favorite :-)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-26-2014, 03:09 PM   #24
sbolokanov
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: абвг
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 82

Rep: Reputation: 18
i3. Kinda hope for i3-like for wayland (i3way, haven't happened so far).
Awesome is my next go-to.
 
Old 12-28-2014, 03:42 PM   #25
weirdwolf
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: 1 AU from a G2V star
Distribution: PCLinuxOS LXDE
Posts: 164

Rep: Reputation: 359Reputation: 359Reputation: 359Reputation: 359
using Openbox
 
Old 12-30-2014, 12:28 PM   #26
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,002

Rep: Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520Reputation: 2520
OpenBox, especially since Crunchbang ran with it and used it as the basis for such a great desktop.

My own Slackware desktop is essentially a recreation of Crunchbang's.
 
Old 01-02-2015, 08:37 AM   #27
dijetlo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: RHELtopia....
Distribution: Solaris 11.2/Slackware/RHEL/
Posts: 1,307
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
People who use "window managers" are really just building their own "desktop environments" so this is really more a question about which tool set you prefer.
Maybe Jeremy should put an option in the "Desktop Environments" poll, just above "Mint", called "Mine" and we can all vote for that one.

That said, in all seriousness, if you don't use Fluxbox...you just suck.
Sorry, it had to be said.
(Face it people, I'm just a troll).

Last edited by dijetlo; 01-02-2015 at 08:39 AM. Reason: "a", "an"... why don't we just pick on and go with it?
 
Old 01-03-2015, 01:42 AM   #28
Flymo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Often travelling
Distribution: Bodhi Linux 2/3 , Puppy, Knoppix, SliTaz, Raspbian, Kali
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 16
Talking Not Fluxbox this year, but.....

Heh!
@dijetlo - troll indeed! <grin>
As a former FluxMeister who has moved to Enlightenment, I would mention menu creation/maintenance as a messy area in Fluxbox. But I did love building truly unusual desktops (tabs on the side and all) and adding a tiny seasoning of motional bling with xcompmgr.

I love them both, and like all of the boxen pretty well, but E is the one I love most, by far. Fluxbox is the ex who is a good pal, now!,

Well worth trying a decent implementation of E in 2015.

We are up to E19 now - still early days of course, but amazingly functional, and E17 has been rock-solid for us since Bodhi 1.0 back in 2011.
Even our N00Bz like it a lot, so long as I hold their hands a bit at first.
It's not for everyone, even with Flux skillz it's been a learning experience, but boy does it deliver! So a distro with a good team and detailed docs is strongly recommended.
I'd recommend Bodhi in that regard.
 
Old 01-03-2015, 02:42 AM   #29
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US, Earth, end border$! ◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on my cheapest, has been KDE or CLI but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 3,089
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840
Talking

I like them all but only one can do anything the others can (except strip down to the smallest foot print, no pun.) Experience Freedom!
 
Old 01-06-2015, 08:47 AM   #30
aguador
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2014
Location: Madrid, Spain
Distribution: Manjaro, Mageia
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Enlightenment -- the Everything WM or Some Things DE

I'd agree with the "Mine" or "I roll my own" category for those who use WMs in place of DEs. I started with MATE (solid) then moved to KDE (loved the configurability and much else, but not akonadi, social desktop, Kontact, etc.). In the end, you start developing preferences that generally leave you customizing a DE (or, in the case of KDE, not using a lot of its features), and you effectively roll your own.

So my computers and my vote goes to Enlightenment which I run in Manjaro -- a great distro that keeps you up to date. Tried installing Bodhi several times, but always got annoyed with the process (even with Synaptic) and the Ubuntu base with aging versions of programs. The distro does have a niche, though, and I hope it survives the current transition (still no 3.0, no movement visible on the website nor new releases). Jeff correctly understood that E18+ is really too demanding for 32-bit architecture, so Bodhi's E17-32-bit and E19-64-bit versions will fill a gap, assuming the new developers are able to keep the distro going.

Returning to the first point, a "Mine" or "Roll Your Own" category fits nicely with E which still falls between WM, as it does offer more, and DE, as its native tools are -- with the exception of Terminology and Everything -- generally quite limited.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 63 06-14-2012 04:04 PM
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 67 01-18-2012 02:00 AM
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 48 06-09-2011 01:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration