2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2014. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Network Monitoring Application of the Year
Hmmm.... another category that doesn't really fit the LQ user profile so it seems we have various low post count contenders crawling out of the woodwork promoting their fave product. So take that with a large dose of salt...
That said, here's my $.02:
In years past I have voted OpenNMS. And then maybe Zabbix. This past year, however, I worked with nagios and check_mk and was favorably impressed. CheckMK goes along ways towards resolving nagios's many warts and gets rid of vexing backend rdbms bottleneck issues at scale. Written in Python and fairly comprehensible to deal with if you need to roll your own plugin, etc. It's hard to vote for Nagios on it's own though cuz that pretty much still sucks (as evidenced by the many derivatives/spinoffs). Hmm... decisions, decisions... Moreover, there are a couple in this list that I'm unfamiliar with so going to have to ponder this one a bit. MCA's are always a chance to learn/explore.
I have been using several NMSes for years - even some commercial ones.
In early 2014 I decided to try zabbix and was able to get rid of cacti and nagios.
In the meantime I am really impressed about the variety and quantity of features Zabbix has.
Zabbix by a mile. Its SNMP low level discovery and other specific SNMP support elements make it stand out from other Enterprise NMS solution that focus agent based management and only consider SNMP as an after thought.
It's hard to vote for Nagios on it's own though cuz that pretty much still sucks (as evidenced by the many derivatives/spinoffs). Hmm... decisions, decisions...
That's like saying "Unix sucks because there are so many derivatives/spinoffs."
That's like saying "Unix sucks because there are so many derivatives/spinoffs."
Not even remotely. But I guess if you need to believe that, then I can't argue the point.
Unix does not suck. It's success resulted in numerous commercial and open source variants.
Nagios, in it's non commercial implementation, sucks. Hence, imo, you absolutely MUST pair it with something else, e.g. CheckMK. Else use one of the spinoffs.
Grok the difference in underlying motivations now?
Zabbix by a mile. Its SNMP low level discovery and other specific SNMP support elements make it stand out from other Enterprise NMS solution that focus agent based management and only consider SNMP as an after thought.
Really? Ho man! Have you ever used OpenNMS? It's raison d'etre is SNMP discovery. To the fault of not doing all that great a job on other stuff. I think, however, that they've leveraged the CheckMK agent for client side polling and such.
All of these tools have their warts. I'm really impressed with Nagios Core coupled with CheckMK though. Ditching the rdbms requisite is also a win. Monitoring is complex enough w/o needing to add rdbms management into the mix.
It's been a few years since I used Zabbix. I might should take a look at it again.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.