LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2013-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-109/)
-   -   Virtualization Product of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2013-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-109/virtualization-product-of-the-year-4175488214/)

rcpavlicek 12-18-2013 03:46 PM

Xen, It is used by some of the biggest clouds in the world and it has a lot of new development happening as well.

Plam 12-18-2013 04:31 PM

+1

Especially since XenServer is Open Source, allowing fast deployments with a nice api (XAPI). For an example of possibilities, go check Xen Orchestra project :)

hypermatt 12-18-2013 05:11 PM

Xen (yes, I'm joining the party :) ). Paravirtualization works great and with PVH coming out shortly, one gets the best of both worlds by using hardware virtualization where it's most effective.

Also, Mirage OS is a cool new use of Xen and is one of the first things I've seen that really does deserve the use of a term like "cloud-based" to describe it as it's not just throwing another OS in a VM just to run one or two applications. Since Xen powers the big public clouds (eg. AWS) you can use it there right now.

BerzinTehvs 12-19-2013 12:54 AM

Virtualbox (due to the simple installation and VM management)

teresaejunior 12-19-2013 03:45 AM

Meeting VBox was one the best things that happened to my virtual life!

jppo 12-19-2013 04:16 AM

Preferred virtual system
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremy (Post 5081916)
What is your VM of choice?

--jeremy

I use XEN and KVM.

abobadilla 12-19-2013 09:45 PM

Xen
 
I work with Xen and Xenserver open source. In my case the best solution after probe many others virtualization system.

ricciare 12-20-2013 01:56 PM

VirtualBox

273 12-20-2013 02:17 PM

It's tough to say:
I only use VirtualBox and it does what I want (allowing me to play with other distros and OSs quickly and easily. However, it does use a noticeable amount of processing power to do so.
In my experience on my system VMWare seemed to be worse, but I understand this is not usually the case.
I should use KVM and the rest but for me as a home hobby user they're too much like hard work to get up and running.
Now I know about LXC I'll have a look at that though as if it's along the lines I get the impression it is it could be great for running two Linux distros at the same time at native speed which could be ideal for a few things I'd like to do.
Can I vote for them all?!

trosdejos 12-30-2013 03:14 AM

At work I use VMWare ESXi and works great emulating Windows, CentOS, Ubuntu Server, ... As a Desktop app I use VMware Fusion (for Mac) and Parallels Desktop (also for mac) and all two work great, perhaps VMWare needs less CPU and GPU.
I vote VMWare.

ericson007 12-30-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trosdejos (Post 5088897)
At work I use VMWare ESXi and works great emulating Windows, CentOS, Ubuntu Server, ... As a Desktop app I use VMware Fusion (for Mac) and Parallels Desktop (also for mac) and all two work great, perhaps VMWare needs less CPU and GPU.
I vote VMWare.

I do think vmware is good. They have been at it for a while. Just not sure i like their licensing.

sycho123321 12-30-2013 10:17 PM

I like virtual box because it has usb support pre made options for os' and just plain works

kingbeowulf 12-31-2013 02:00 AM

Qemu hands down. Virtualbox has issues on pure x86_64

allend 01-01-2014 12:06 AM

I like QEMU with KVM.

Medievalist 01-02-2014 11:50 AM

Shouldn't ovirt (the FOSS upstream of Red Hat's RHEVM product) be mentioned?

http://www.ovirt.org


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.