LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2013. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 4th.


Notices

View Poll Results: Server Distribution of the Year
CentOS 95 15.91%
Debian 143 23.95%
Gentoo 10 1.68%
Mandriva Enterprise Server 4 0.67%
Oracle Enterprise Linux 3 0.50%
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 51 8.54%
Scientific Linux 6 1.01%
Slackware 190 31.83%
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 19 3.18%
Ubuntu LTS 76 12.73%
Voters: 597. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2014, 01:11 PM   #16
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: Slackware 14.1, Kubuntu 14.10
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 8

Debian should be the standard for servers. Plenty of server packages, support for plenty of platforms. Uses the package manager and package format used by most GNU/Linux users.
 
Old 01-12-2014, 07:01 AM   #17
dragoon_jas
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Rizal, Philippines
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS, OpenBSD
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slackware, is the best! very stable, we have no problem for our mailserver for almost 5 years, installed in a P4 clone PC.
Talking about stability, security, speed, and robustness it's proven.
 
Old 01-15-2014, 04:17 AM   #18
savotije
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Serbia (Europe)
Distribution: Slackware 13.1
Posts: 97

Rep: Reputation: 6
CentOS
 
Old 01-15-2014, 04:21 AM   #19
metalaarif
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2011
Location: Nepal
Distribution: RHEL, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 114
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2
I use RHEL, CentOS and Slackware but I think Slackware is the Best
 
Old 01-15-2014, 08:36 AM   #20
Cristiano Urban
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2013
Location: Gonars (UD), Italy
Distribution: CentOS, Fedora, Slackware
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 1
CentOS
 
Old 01-15-2014, 09:04 AM   #21
coc568
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am going with Slackware
 
Old 01-17-2014, 02:24 AM   #22
Tux!
Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: OpenSUSE
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 20
For light in-house servers (to run things like git, jenkins, databases etc) I run OpenSUSE. Just as easy to install as my desktop. It has proven to meet our needs and it is very stable.
Running Evergreen versions gets me prolonged updates.
 
Old 01-17-2014, 08:44 AM   #23
Habitual
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Distribution: Undecided
Posts: 3,576
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I voted CentOS as our company uses that on it's managed servers.
It is predictable and easily configured and serviced.

I can't tell you how many times an "apt-get install x" has broken things.
Not everything in a Ubuntu repo works OOTB.
 
Old 01-19-2014, 07:52 PM   #24
charles95
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Arch Linux, Windows 7
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
CentOS. It's free. It's solid and each release has a very long life.
 
Old 01-20-2014, 08:10 PM   #25
Genesis2
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2014
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I really like Debian Stable for servers. And it is quite good for desktop also.
 
Old 01-22-2014, 09:38 AM   #26
mariuz
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: debian sid/experimental
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 17
I use Debian stable and Ubuntu LTS , Gentoo looks interesting with openrc init system on the server side
 
Old 01-25-2014, 01:53 PM   #27
gotfw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 327

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by taurolyon View Post
From this list, Deb or Cent - but I'd probably build an Arch system from the ground up.
Even for server side of things, eh? And I'm not just thinking about running lts kernel here, but don't you think maybe a bit too bleeding edge? Yeah, rolling distros tend to find, and fix, things quickly, but maybe a bit too risky for applications where stability is key consideration? Seriously, I'm curious if anyone other than Arch project itself is really running this server side in a production environment?
 
Old 01-29-2014, 08:11 AM   #28
touch21st
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Distribution: Linux Mint, CentOS, Suse,Android, Slackware, FreeBSD,Kali
Posts: 79
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Suse, Red hat, Debian
 
Old 02-02-2014, 06:32 PM   #29
dansimon
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2013
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotfw View Post
Even for server side of things, eh? And I'm not just thinking about running lts kernel here, but don't you think maybe a bit too bleeding edge?
I am no expert but I have heard that some people prize Arch as a server OS. One reason being that the changes come in very small packages and are easy for sysadmins to adapt to, as opposed to a full reinstall with massive changes, another strength is that you quickly get security patches straight from the source code developers, this is a nice contrast to servers such as Debian and RHEL witch has to maintain essentialy legacy software.

But if you are planing to run Arch as a server you *NEED* to subscribe to the security newsfeed and always check it before doing system updates. It is also probably wise to exclude mission critical packages from your package manager, and update these manually.

Conclusion: It is possible to use Arch as a server, but I don't know if it would be "better" then the more traditional server distros, and I would not recommend it to lazy sysadmins

Last edited by dansimon; 02-02-2014 at 06:35 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-03-2014, 08:14 PM   #30
ganey
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Distribution: Win7 / CentOS
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
CentOS. I like RHEL systems and building from source. Yes sometimes I have more debugging to do, but I have more control and don't just go with they "okay install all the deps for me"

I only recently updated a Cent5 to the latest Cent6, everything was still working on the 5 box.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 55 03-22-2012 05:13 PM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 76 03-02-2011 08:38 AM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 41 06-29-2010 03:11 PM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 62 02-14-2009 02:06 AM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 46 05-08-2008 10:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration