LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/)
-   -   Virtualization Product of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-95/virtualization-product-of-the-year-919894/)

anon189 02-01-2012 06:16 AM

Virtual Box does the trick for me, runs great, though often a new version comes out, for which extensions need to be loaded seperately (installed machines keep on working though).

rMatey 02-01-2012 06:36 AM

Virtual Product
 
Virtual box.

MrRtd 02-01-2012 09:18 PM

Virtualbox
 
I have to admit I haven't tried the others, but VirtualBox has been so reliable and easy to use, I haven't had the itch to try any of its competetors.

klearview 02-02-2012 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnV2 (Post 4565829)
But I think Proxmox is for management only right? is like a webmin but for VM?

Wrong. Proxmox is a Debian-based distro with a Red Hat-derived kernel and a suite of VM management tools.

Archenoth 02-02-2012 07:53 PM

I would have to vote for VMWare... It is far more robust, and supports hardware forwarding MUCH better than Virtualbox does... You can do a lot more cool tricks with VMWare than you can with Virtualbox. Also, VMWare has tech notes about most of these tricks... Like booting another OS on your physical system so you don't have to reboot to get to your other OS, or simultaneous input from two separate systems allowing one computer to split into two (Or more) separately controlled systems with independent input. As well as booting network drives, or countless other tricks...

Virtualbox can't do these things.

savotije 02-06-2012 12:26 PM

VirtualBox for me.. :)

Satyaveer Arya 02-08-2012 12:00 PM

VirtualBox.

Gerard Lally 02-08-2012 10:16 PM

KVM-Qemu on Slackware, Xen on NetBSD


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.