2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2011. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 9th.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I think Midori has a really bright future and I was tempted to vote for it but I went with the browser I've used for years, Iceweasel. Yes I know it is bloated but I just cant seem to like another browser.
I use Firfox a lot, because it just works. Almost every time I have problem, it's usually something I did I also like Links (and it's derivatives) in the terminal. Because I'm studying to become a web developer, I also have Opera and Epiphany installed, so I can test different rendering engines with my pages. I used to have Chrome/Chromium, but I dumped it for Epiphany because the devs are less shady and AFAIK are more honest to their users.
SeaMonkey is good for lower-end machines, because it provides you with email, IRC, and a browser in one package. Uzbl isn't really that usable to me. I find it kind of strange that it relies on an external program for the address/search/whatever bar. And would it kill the devs/packagers to put all the user config files in one place by default? Uzbl still hold promise though. I can't wait to see how the keyboard-driven browser evolves.
My vote in the poll was for Chromium. But I am still a die hard Seamonkey user. (Which I am using posting while on this forum) Rekonq has come along way which I have warmed to using more in the last year.