2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2010. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th 8th. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Network Monitoring Application of the Year
|
|
Nagios
|
  
|
239 |
61.76% |
|
OpenNMS
|
  
|
46 |
11.89% |
|
Zenoss
|
  
|
25 |
6.46% |
|
Hyperic
|
  
|
3 |
0.78% |
|
GroundWork Monitor
|
  
|
1 |
0.26% |
|
munin
|
  
|
5 |
1.29% |
|
OpenQRM
|
  
|
5 |
1.29% |
|
ZABBIX
|
  
|
18 |
4.65% |
|
Ganglia
|
  
|
1 |
0.26% |
|
monit
|
  
|
3 |
0.78% |
|
mon
|
  
|
3 |
0.78% |
|
Big Brother
|
  
|
3 |
0.78% |
|
Osmius
|
  
|
1 |
0.26% |
|
Icinga
|
  
|
21 |
5.43% |
|
Shinken
|
  
|
12 |
3.10% |
|
Opsview
|
  
|
1 |
0.26% |
 |
|
01-12-2011, 04:33 PM
|
#1
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,532
|
Network Monitoring Application of the Year
What is your monitoring application of choice?
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
01-13-2011, 05:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia Cauldron & Salix 14
Posts: 939
Rep:
|
What, no EtherApe...that is the one I use the most.
|
|
|
|
01-15-2011, 11:04 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Distribution: Gentoo; FreeBSD
Posts: 180
Rep:
|
no ntop either, what kinda network monitor poll is this
|
|
|
|
01-16-2011, 09:46 AM
|
#4
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,532
Original Poster
|
EtherApe and ntop are not monitoring tools in the same context of this category. A rename to "Infrastructure Monitoring" may be appropriate to alleviate any confusion.
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 11:57 AM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
If it's going to be one. It'll be Zenoss. Great documentation. Easy of use and excellent support.
|
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 03:31 PM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
If you Google "open source network management" the first hit is OpenNMS. It has been around for over 10 years, and has a long track record of managing enterprise networks. At one site they are collecting 1.2 million data points every 5 minutes. At another they are parsing 125,000 syslog messages a minute (for over 8 hours at a time). In Italy there is a carrier where each device has over 32,000 virtual interfaces, yet OpenNMS can discover and handle them all. Another carrier in Switzerland is monitoring nearly 70,000 discreet devices with a single instance. And Papa John's Pizza has almost 3000 OpenNMS remote monitors all running at the same time - one in each of their stores - talking back to a single instance of OpenNMS.
It is truly enterprise grade product that is 100% free and open source software, without a separate "enterprise edition" priced per node.
Note that as one of the project maintainers I'm a bit biased (grin)
|
|
|
|
01-17-2011, 04:56 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
OpenNMS 100%
OpenNMS all the way. Completely customizable and plays well with 3rd party software such as ticketing systems and Rancid. The Jasper reports are eye-candy. Escalations and notifications don't blow up my inbox. The Provisioning policies and API reduces cost of ownership. The software is free and commercial support is available through the developers. All this Power comes with a learning curve, which once overcome you will realize why OpenNMS truly is considered "Enterprise Grade".
|
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 02:02 AM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
OpenNMS for sure. I'm an OGP member and I'm working on OpenNMS until 2002. Tarus, the interfaces on the Italian carrier are 120.000 on each node and we monitor 30 of such nodes giving the end user a stright picture of how the network is working. Finally let me say that the Jasper Report Integration was the last feature to really say "OpenNMS is the best Enterprise Grade open source (truly) Infrastructure Monitoring System"
|
|
|
|
01-18-2011, 07:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
OpenNMS
True Open Source, scalable and a very smart and good looking community.
|
|
|
|
01-19-2011, 10:49 PM
|
#10
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
OpenNMS
Have been using OpenNMS for over two years. Work for a west coast city. Monitoring over 900 devices. Great product.
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 01:21 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado
Distribution: sabayon
Posts: 175
Rep:
|
missing great ones.
Jeremy, you don't have etherape, or wireshark. I'm not voting in this one until you have both of them or at least one of them listed.
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 10:15 AM
|
#12
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 9,532
Original Poster
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by portamenteff
Jeremy, you don't have etherape, or wireshark. I'm not voting in this one until you have both of them or at least one of them listed.
|
I've already addressed those: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...2/#post4226170
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 11:58 AM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware 14.0(workstation), Redhat 5/6(server)
Posts: 529
Rep:
|
Pardon my ignorance but does WireShark not fit in Network Monitoring Application category  ?
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 12:08 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: C:\MSDOS\
Distribution: LFS 3.8.11 with OpenBox 3.5.0
Posts: 1,459
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrinceSharma
Pardon my ignorance but does WireShark not fit in Network Monitoring Application category  ?
|
Network Monitoring and Network Traffic Analyzing are two seperate things.
Network Monitoring denotes checking Network services for Availability and sometimes performance. Pinging something and making sure it is up, paging out if it is not, is Network Monitoring.
Network Traffic Analyzing is a subset of this, but is used primarily for finding bottlenecks or broken infrastructure, such as bad switches or wires. Wireshark is a traffic analyzer and is considered a troubleshooting tool, not a monitoring tool.
|
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 12:25 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware 14.0(workstation), Redhat 5/6(server)
Posts: 529
Rep:
|
Thanks for bothering  .
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|