LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2010. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th 8th.

Notices


View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
KDE 234 33.05%
Gnome 319 45.06%
Xfce 104 14.69%
GNUstep 1 0.14%
rox 8 1.13%
LXDE 40 5.65%
Trinity-DE 2 0.28%
Voters: 708. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-16-2011, 09:09 PM   #16
afreitascs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 443

Rep: Reputation: 30

KDE
 
Old 01-16-2011, 10:50 PM   #17
code933k
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
This one was really hard for me, I don't use a Desktop anymore (basically because it is distracting. Also takes away time and productivity)
XMonad + yeahconsole + tmux is all I need for an interface and the GUI apps I use regularly are all GTK based.
Anyways, my vote goes KDE. They've done a terrific job this year and even managed to take Gnome devs out of their long nap...
One more time, props for KDE.
 
Old 01-16-2011, 11:24 PM   #18
fair_is_fair
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 516

Rep: Reputation: 52
Gnome. Everything "just works" in gnome. Excellent network manager and sound control. A lot of stuff(software) is geared towards ubuntu/nautilus.
I like playing with the alternates but I have to dick around too much to get things working if they work at all.

I had to abandon kde when they went to 4. I have no patience for it now.
 
Old 01-17-2011, 06:00 AM   #19
mlangdn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,845

Rep: Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452
KDE - it gets better every release. Besides, I bought this machine to handle "bloat".
 
Old 01-17-2011, 06:32 AM   #20
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Rep: Reputation: 30
which distro support Rox?

Last edited by TigerLinux; 01-17-2011 at 06:33 AM.
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:15 AM   #21
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazypenguin View Post
Interestingly there was no option for Unity?
Unity is a shell interface for the GNOME desktop environment, not a DE itself.

--jeremy
 
Old 01-17-2011, 06:15 PM   #22
theheadhunter00
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
xfce for sure. i mean have you seen the transfer speeds on thunar? its almost the same as using the command line.
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:18 PM   #23
MithrandirAgain
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Gnome for sure. Xfce and Lxde are okay. Never have liked Kde.
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:40 PM   #24
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 56
How come Unity isn't on that list?
 
Old 01-17-2011, 10:43 PM   #25
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
How come Unity isn't on that list?
I answered this exact question 3 posts ago.

--jeremy
 
Old 01-18-2011, 02:34 AM   #26
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Rep: Reputation: 30
Gnome, i hope it can look more like MAC OSX
 
Old 01-18-2011, 11:40 PM   #27
tommcd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia PA USA
Distribution: Lubuntu, Slackware
Posts: 2,230

Rep: Reputation: 293Reputation: 293Reputation: 293
I still like to keep things light and simple. I voted for XFCE; although I have been impressed with LXDE. The relatively new Lubuntu with LXDE is much faster and lighter than the increasingly bloated Ubuntu. And Lubuntu still does everything that I would ever need or want.
 
Old 01-19-2011, 12:16 AM   #28
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
LXDE for its lightening speed, Xfce takes 45 seconds to load after I login
 
Old 01-19-2011, 10:46 AM   #29
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 -Current
Posts: 890

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anisha Kaul View Post
LXDE for its lightening speed, Xfce takes 45 seconds to load after I login
xfce has never been close to lxde in terms of peppiness in recent times, and may be it never will
 
Old 01-19-2011, 02:27 PM   #30
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
XFCE is only a few seconds slower than LXDE on my machine, but LXDE is certainly much lighter. But I prefer XFCE because "lightness" isn't the only thing I'm looking for in a DE; I also want robustness. XFCE is just the right balance of both, but for some reason its pulling in some heavy GNOME programs with its dependencies.

I like GNOME and it's very easy to use, but it's just ugly. And there's not much room for customization in terms of how it looks. Mint, in my opinion, is the only distro that makes GNOME look decent.

KDE is the best-looking of the bunch and it provides a very "unified" desktop feel, but talk about bloat. And don't even get me started on the system reqs-- KDE eats through my laptop battery in under an hour. I get two and a half hours with XFCE. To top it all off, I hate how everything starts with a K... it's so Korny.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Desktop Environment of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 82 05-13-2010 07:45 AM
Desktop Environment of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 76 02-26-2009 05:03 AM
Desktop Environment of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 255 08-27-2007 04:00 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration