2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2009. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 9th.
Notices
Welcome to
LinuxQuestions.org , a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.
Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us . If you need to reset your password,
click here .
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
View Poll Results: Window Manager of the Year
Fluxbox
97
16.36%
Window Maker
17
2.87%
Enlightenment
29
4.89%
KWin
117
19.73%
Compiz
137
23.10%
MetaCity
38
6.41%
IceWM
31
5.23%
Blackbox
5
0.84%
OpenBox
49
8.26%
xfwm4
32
5.40%
Ratpoison
3
0.51%
Ion
1
0.17%
sawfish
2
0.34%
FVWM
12
2.02%
awesome
12
2.02%
xmonad
11
1.85%
01-11-2010, 07:17 PM
#16
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,018
Rep:
Compiz. Makes my desktop look like a freakin' Star Wars movie.
01-11-2010, 09:45 PM
#17
Member
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 856
Rep:
Quote:
I thought compiz was a windows manager enhancer not a wm it self?
Compiz is a stand-alone WM.
01-11-2010, 10:11 PM
#18
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Rep:
I am using JWM. It is very good for me.
01-11-2010, 10:16 PM
#19
Member
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Reston, VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 183
Rep:
what, no xmonad?
01-11-2010, 10:18 PM
#20
Member
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: NY, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Arch
Posts: 176
Rep:
Openbox gets my vote.
01-12-2010, 05:13 AM
#21
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 118
Rep:
Compiz, although I've been considering switching back to Metacity w/compositing
01-12-2010, 01:10 PM
#22
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 13.1
Posts: 847
Rep:
I am not using any standalone WM, and I haven't really heard much on the WM front - except perhaps a bit more Awesome fans than usual. So I won't vote on this one.
01-12-2010, 01:34 PM
#23
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130
Rep:
Another year without polling Xmonad... F* off! I will go with ratpoison although awesome deserves some praise here.
01-12-2010, 01:35 PM
#24
root
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 8,993
Original Poster
Despite the attitude in your post, xmonad has been added.
--jeremy
01-12-2010, 01:52 PM
#25
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeremy
Despite the attitude in your post, xmonad has been added.
I really appreciate that addition. Thanks Jeremy!
01-12-2010, 04:12 PM
#26
Member
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Ohio
Distribution: ArchLinux, NetBSD
Posts: 476
Rep:
What, no TWM?
01-12-2010, 07:00 PM
#27
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Distribution: LFS-Version SVN-20091202, Arch 2009.08
Posts: 1,450
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JMJ_coder
What, no TWM?
No one really uses TWM seriously...
No seriously guys whos crazy enough to use TWM
01-12-2010, 07:14 PM
#28
Guru
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,057
e17 or e17-svn for debian/ubuntu
fvwm-crystal is a very close 2nd
01-13-2010, 03:26 AM
#29
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Leicester
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 with ROX DE
Posts: 191
Rep:
How about the "other" option for those of use who use really obscure WMs?
01-13-2010, 07:54 AM
#30
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 4,102
Fluxbox from me
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know .
Latest Threads
LQ News