LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2009-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-91/)
-   -   Text Editor of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2009-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-91/text-editor-of-the-year-780666/)

sycamorex 01-13-2010 06:55 AM

Am I the only one who uses emacs?

brianL 01-13-2010 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycamorex (Post 3825004)
Am I the only one who uses emacs?

No, I think RMS uses it as well. :)

sycamorex 01-13-2010 08:28 AM

Thanks, that's comforting.

raju.mopidevi 01-13-2010 08:36 PM

kwrite

chrism01 01-15-2010 12:34 AM

vim FTW
:)

vi will do if vim is not avail eg commercial Unices

MBybee 01-15-2010 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrism01 (Post 3827135)
vim FTW
:)

vi will do if vim is not avail eg commercial Unices

Ironically, this is exactly the reason I ended up learning VI/Vim oh so long ago.

My favorite editor of all time is TPU, then edit /tpu, then when I had to deal with Unix more I ended up with VI.

There is a TPU type emulation for Emacs, but it doesn't do a very good job (no offense to the dev - it's a nice try). It made it so slow and cumbersome (and simply didn't do a lot of stuff). So back to VI.

VI of course lead to Vim which has become very nearly universal :D

indienick 01-15-2010 09:54 PM

I will take my Lisp-aware Emacs, thank you very much. Truth be told, though, I have gotten to like VI (VI != VIM).

Could anyone tell me, why no modern, VI(M) implementation has Lisp-mode any more? In my copy of The Ultimate Guide to the VI and EX Text Editors (1990), it says there is a Lisp-mode, but if you check through the man pages for VI on any BSD, they say that Lisp-mode is not yet implemented.

Should be accessible through:
Code:

:set lisp

librano 01-17-2010 04:32 PM

Kate is Kewl

raju.mopidevi 01-17-2010 04:36 PM

Hi Librano,
You lost your choice. KATE is there.
  • vim
  • vi
  • emacs
  • Kate
  • leafpad
  • jEdit
  • nano
  • gedit
  • pico
  • Nedit
  • joe
  • Scite
  • Midnight Commander Editor
  • KWrite
  • Mousepad
  • Scribes
  • medit

Rumor 01-18-2010 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flatdog (Post 3821967)
vim.
And geany, not listed here :)

+1 to both

Tom6 01-18-2010 09:11 AM

Gedit
 
It's there ready in my daily use distro with no frills or fuss. It works so i haven't really tried others. Nice enough gui.

I also like vi when i was stuck on a command-line for a little while. Very nice :) Scite is pretty. It seems a lot of work has gone into making a lot of nice text-editors to suit different ppl for different purposes. That's what i really like. If i was forced to use only the 1 text-editor i would resent it but having the choice allows me to relax and enjoy it :)

Thanks all and regards from
Tom :)

JZL240I-U 01-20-2010 05:14 AM

Kate vs. Kwrite
 
I only recently installed KDE 4.x along with SuSE 11.2. There is a new Kwrite there which is a real lot improved over the older version(s). I voted for Kate but I'm not sure that this came about only because I have no experience with Kwrite yet...

choogendyk 01-20-2010 06:28 AM

vi forever!

(I have to confess, though, that I really like and use TextWrangler on my Mac desktop. But routine editing on my servers is always with vi.)

anticapitalista 01-20-2010 08:45 AM

nano and geany

kenny_mckormick 01-20-2010 09:57 AM

I use only vim and geany (not listed here)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.