2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2009. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 9th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
As noted in my earlier post, the future of MySQL is in a pretty precarious situation. I'd certainly be evaluating alternatives for any new projects. Don't pay any attention to what Oracle says. Just look at what they do. Actions are louder than words.
I use MySQL for most things because it requires the least configuration for things like Drupal, Mediawiki, and other open source web based applications. It is now feature rich enough that I don't miss anything and it is very simple to administer. It literally requires almost zero effort. And that is the way it should be in my opinion.
For the Java guys....
I have to add Derby/Cloudscape/Java DB or whatever you want to call it now. It is great for things that are bigger than what should exist in memory. Obviously this is a Java based choice and with the inclusion in Java 6 it makes structured, efficient storage easy. It also works well in embedded mode in applications. Since it is integrated with the latest version of Glassfish, it is easy to get your database up and running quickly.
I mock my data access for unit testing, but HSQLDB (used to be called Hypersonic) can be good for in memory stuff.
I'm kind of sorry to see Firebird falling. I used to really like it, but MySQL has gotten so much better it is not worth the effort to set up Firebird anymore. Postgres is usually added effort as well, but it is really good RDBMS. If I needed better performance, I'd go Postres or Firebird, but I haven't seen a need beyond MySQL in the last few years. Basically, I end up using MySQL because it comes with Slackware and it is easy to run Drupal on it.
I used to maintain several database servers simultaneously, but it is not worth the effort for my needs. At any given time I had 5 or 6 RDBMS's running. I'm over that now, MySQL is enough.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.