LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
Reload this Page Window Manager of the Year
User Name
Password
2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.

Notices

View Poll Results: Window Manager of the Year
Fluxbox 130 16.48%
Window Maker 18 2.28%
Enlightenment 51 6.46%
KWin 127 16.10%
Compiz 249 31.56%
MetaCity 42 5.32%
IceWM 38 4.82%
Blackbox 8 1.01%
OpenBox 51 6.46%
xfwm4 30 3.80%
Ratpoison 7 0.89%
Ion 3 0.38%
sawfish 2 0.25%
FVWM 10 1.27%
awesome 23 2.92%
Voters: 789. You may not vote on this poll

Tags used in this thread
Popular LQ Tags ,

Reply
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 Last »
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2009, 01:40 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,139
Thanked: 164
Window Manager of the Year

[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
If you are looking for KDE, Gnome, etc they are in the Desktop Environment Award.

--jeremy
jeremy is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 11:09 PM   #2
taylor_venable
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Indiana, USA
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 896
Thanked: 17
Maybe add CWM. AFAIK it got started on OpenBSD (where I run it) but it can be run on Linux as well. It is truly minimalistic.
taylor_venable is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 03:34 AM   #3
vermaden
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 250
Thanked: 3
I do not see PekWM option ...
vermaden is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 04:29 AM   #4
Mark7
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04 with ROX DE
Posts: 164
Thanked: 4
No awesome, either.
Mark7 is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 09:51 AM   #5
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,139
Thanked: 164

Original Poster
awesome has been added.

--jeremy
jeremy is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 04:13 PM   #6
vermaden
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 250
Thanked: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
awesome has been added.

--jeremy
What about pekwm mate?
vermaden is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2009, 05:22 PM   #7
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,139
Thanked: 164

Original Poster
vermaden, it's not always the case that a single request gets something included (especially in a poll that already has a lot of entries). awesome had multiple requests last year as well.

--jeremy
jeremy is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 03:39 AM   #8
vermaden
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 250
Thanked: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
vermaden, it's not always the case that a single request gets something included (especially in a poll that already has a lot of entries). awesome had multiple requests last year as well.

--jeremy
Yeah, TWO for awesome @ 2007 exacly, same TWO for pekwm @ 2007, just checked at Window Manager @ 2007
vermaden is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 08:52 AM   #9
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, OpenBSD, OpenSolaris
Posts: 1,724
Thanked: 26
Maybe StumpWM?
indienick is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 01:43 PM   #10
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
Contributing Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 6,712
Blog Entries: 2
Thanked: 213
fluxbox
H_TeXMeX_H is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:16 PM   #11
sycamorex
Senior Member
Contributing Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware 13 32/64
Posts: 1,654
Thanked: 75
fluxbox all the way. At first it felt akward to use...
sycamorex is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 02:34 PM   #12
Mark7
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04 with ROX DE
Posts: 164
Thanked: 4
Openbox.

Even though it doesn't give you the choice to disable raise on focus
Mark7 is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2009, 03:53 PM   #13
Hitboxx
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 3
Thanked: 5
Compiz.
Hitboxx is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 03:24 AM   #14
SqdnGuns
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Sarasota, FL
Distribution: Slackware64 ® 13.0
Posts: 707
Thanked: 20
Fluxbox
SqdnGuns is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2009, 03:27 AM   #15
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Odense, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 823
Thanked: 3
Openbox.
mjjzf is offline     Reply With Quote

Reply
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 Last »

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 50 02-25-2008 11:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - LinuxQuestions.org - Linux Forums
Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration