2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
* loads fast
* Switches line number fast (use case: G++ reports an erronous line number)
* Find-and-replace is fast
* Syntax hilighting is fast
* Search is fast to type and run
vi is:
- standard *nix editor
- the fastest (to edit with)
- relatively small and light (less of an issue these days, but still a plus)
- more ergonomic (once you remap ESC/CAPS as you do more with less movement
- full featured.
emacs is at least full featured (a massive understatement for an editor that can browse the web, play chess with you, etc.) and reasonably likely to be installed on any *nix system you have to work with.
as far as i'm concerned the other editors suck faeces through a straw, but obviously some people love them, so it's good that they're around. i was grateful for nano in my first few hours on gnu/linux, when vi seemed strange and evil and i just wanted something that worked a bit like notepad.
Distribution: Fedora 10[Cambridge] and Ubuntu 9.04[Jaunty]
Posts: 201
Rep:
my favorite is and will always be vi/vim. though i've been using this for quite a long time, but stil there are hell of features yet to be discovered/used by me. m a great fan of vi. vi/vim rocks!!!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.