2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2008. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
+1 to Gnus. It's a pity that it's not on the list.
I've certainly enjoyed using Gnus in the past. I've also enjoyed using exmh, and when I want a flexible console Email tool, I use mutt. However, in recent years, I have found that I can use Seamonkey mail and news on multiple platforms. I find that the Seamonkey Internet Suite is just as effective, and in some ways, more so than the combination of Firefox and Thunderbird. I use Seamonkey in Web browsing mode for Webmail, and I use the Email client to pull in POP3 and IMAP4 mail, and I use the Email client to send most of my mail using the SMTP capabilities.
It scales well and it keeps getting consistently better. I plan to continue using it in 2009.
Mutt in text mode, Sylpheed in GUI mode. Been using Evolution last few months, trying to give Gnome the benefit of the doubt, but ultimately it sucks almost as much as Outlook. And therein lies its biggest flaw - trying to keep winblows/exchange converts happy....
Claws Mail. it is light, integrates well in the XFCE/Gnome desktop, fewer dependencies than Sylpheed (as i remember). btw, i didn't use most of the programs here, i'll keep the poll as a reference for future "must try".
Mutt in text mode, Sylpheed in GUI mode. Been using Evolution last few months, trying to give Gnome the benefit of the doubt, but ultimately it sucks almost as much as Outlook. And therein lies its biggest flaw - trying to keep winblows/exchange converts happy....
This is what I've found. It's not sufficient as an Outlook replacement, but it's too close to Outlook to be a good mail client.
Sylpheed and Mutt for me, too. With Sylpheed getting my vote 'cause I feel sympathy for it in the face of the amount of Claws users there seems to be.
Wow apparently nobody uses mail clients that run on emacs anymore.
I use Mew, which runs on emacs. I tried evolution a bit, but I found it a bit slow to start...
I like Mew mostly because it is very fast. Not only to read emails but also answering, or writing them. Reading an e-mail I press "a", and I'm answering it. Press "w" and I'm writing another. It has a very handy automatic created aliases list, multiple sessions, etc. I'm just very pleased with it.
Sylpheed and Mutt for me, too. With Sylpheed getting my vote 'cause I feel sympathy for it in the face of the amount of Claws users there seems to be.
lol. funny but i know the feeling, when in doubt - tend to choose the more unprivileged one. i think i used this in one of this year's polls.
on the other side, i don't blame the other guys, with a "the strong should survive" approach, both are normal and interesting to observe . http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...d_aristocratic
KMail, does everything I want in a e-mail client, only improvement I would like to see is a highlite, and right mouse click copy... I like the text only receive and send...
Alpine, baby -- filtering, piping, sorting, color coding, automating -- and all crazy fast. Will also cook you breakfast and mow the lawn (via an extension).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.