2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
mplayer is good, it has better navigation than xine. But, when I was playing my dvd, the dvd menu wouldn't come out and the sound was played 3 second before the video. When I ran on the terminal it said "YOUR CPU IS TOO SLOW TO PLAY DVD". Well, I use PIII 800 MHz with 256 MB RAM and 32 MB RIVA TNT2. But, I used kaffeine with xine-engine and my dvd played smoothly, even the menu appeared. so I choose kaffeine.
mplayer is behind xine in DVD menu
xine is behind mplayer in menu ergonomics
both are loosers in playlist building
both have excellent engines
the first frontend that binds them proper will rock!
Distribution: Slackware and Slax - because I'm a sucker for speed. ;-)
Posts: 476
Thanked: 0
Do You have any clue?
Quote:
Originally Posted by portamenteff
VLC by far. Mplayer is proprietary software. VLC is Gnu-GPL
Please elaborate?
For I studied the code (GPL) of MPlayer ant there stands it's GPL, how so if You are right?
Or was it a typo / misinterpretation or an other -nonmplayer ?
Distribution: zenwalk, ubuntu, vector, linux Mint, Sabayon, Archlinux, mepis
Posts: 40
Thanked: 0
totem movie player simply rocks. You can do a lot with it. I do not know about skin. vlc and mplayer are also very good as well. I am surprised smplayer is not there. Would have been my fist choice .
My reasoning might seem a little lame, but Totem was the default player for Ubuntu, and quite simply, I've found no need to try anything else. It just works.
Distribution: zenwalk, ubuntu, vector, linux Mint, Sabayon, Archlinux, mepis
Posts: 40
Thanked: 0
what linux distro are you running?
If Debian-based like Ubuntu or Mepis, you may use synaptic or your installer and simply search for vlc, libdvdcss2, etc, {as a warning depending on your country, the libdvdcss2 may be illegal to use}
Best of luck. You can install Linux Mint or PCLinuxOS as these already come with it. There are many others, but these are my preferred choices for a newbie.
For your average low res xvid it doesnt really matter. I used to use vlc and mplayer and found them both exactly identical for what i use them for (they even used the same codecs basically), except when I was playing around with streaming vlc has some great features there. However since we entered the era of 1080p x264 video files, I have had to switch to using coreavc on windows. The ffmpeg decoder that vlc and other players use just doesnt handle it, even on my quad core with a recent graphics card. 720p is fine, 1080p doesnt go at all.
If anyone can bring me up to date on how to play 1080p x264 mkvs on linux i would gladly switch back.
I voted mplayer, because if nothing else works - mplayer does. VLC is a close second. I much prefer the interface of VLC, and the ability to drag-and-drop everything, including whole directory structures into the playlist. But lately mplayer works better. Especially with DVD's. - Totem doesn't let me change the language through the menu, and VLC is not starting due to a bug. That could also be related to my cpu, which seems be faulty.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.