LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2007-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-79/)
-   -   File Manager of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2007-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-79/file-manager-of-the-year-610231/)

deepclutch 01-16-2008 01:48 PM

Thunar is fine.but Nautilus is what i find easy! :)

sakura_san 01-16-2008 11:44 PM

MC, of course.I using it even in X, I have not been able to find nothing that replaces it. Sometimes I use Thunar too.

Vadi.ubuntu 01-17-2008 09:31 AM

No Dolphin?

Linegod 01-18-2008 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JLP (Post 3011043)
I miss Dolphin on the list.

I second that

jhigz 01-19-2008 09:15 PM

I voted for gentoo because I always turn to it when I need to manipulate files from within the GUI. I recently started using Thunar and like what I see, especially the Bulk Rename...

EmaRsk 01-21-2008 01:49 PM

The shell ;-)

I'll vote for mc, which I use occasionally

theriddle 01-21-2008 10:19 PM

Thanks for adding Dolphin :).

Mega Man X 01-22-2008 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theriddle (Post 3030901)
Thanks for adding Dolphin :).

Same here. Thanks! :). I voted for Dolphin, but I used to be very addicted to MC myself, in my good old days of Slackware + Open/Fluxbox. Ah, the memories :).

I even went as far as using Farmanager in Windows. It is a MC clone for Windows created by some guys at Rar Labs. Worth a look for you MC users who has to use Windows from time to time.

Regards!

alred 01-22-2008 04:15 AM

why mc was not included in every linux by default ... not that i like it or will use it as my default file manager in linux ...

emacs can be really big if its actually functional to me on my system ...

whats actually is the difference with or without mc included by default ... ??




.

Takla 02-01-2008 03:12 AM

I voted for Thunar because it is fast to start and fast to use. It seems to appear on my screen on the k of *click* :-) But of course it has to be useable too and it is. The custom actions are easy to set up and work really well. With a right click I can open images, convert flac to ogg, mount/unmount iso, play or queue music files or playlists into audacious, search, create/extract archives, of course open a terminal, search and replace text in a file, burn iso images, see disk useage and so on...and all this in a speedy and lightweight file manager! I also use and love emelfm2 and if I could have voted twice I'd vote for it as well.

code933k 02-01-2008 10:14 AM

Midnight Commander! period.

Thunar is doing it well but I returned to Nautilus for graphical stuff. Do you know what's silly in both of them? There's no undo button if you make a bad mouse move. That's their most evident security risk.

shadowsnipes 02-01-2008 02:19 PM

Dolphin and Thunar for me. I haven't used mc enough for it to completely grow on me yet, but eventually it might overtake the others. In the same vein, I might try out worker. Dolphin is my current choice as I am using KDE. Otherwise, it'd be Thunar.

I don't really care for using nautilus or konqueror as a file manager.

xma 02-01-2008 02:27 PM

I voted rox-filer but I'd have voted for M-x dired if present :)

G13man 02-02-2008 12:15 AM

the newbie(ME)can only look what came with the package, one is thuner and the other is xfe, i'm leaning xfe

paperplane 02-03-2008 05:09 PM

A vote for Emelfm2.

as for pcmanfm, well i just spent 1 and a half hours trying to install it. the website says 'simple and easy to use'.
not if getting the thing and all its dependancies installed is anything to go by.

heaven for me would be a *really* simple file manager in gtk1 or 2 (preferably 1), im talking 1 window pane listing the files in that dir. right-click on a file brings up a customizable context menu for you to run your own commands on that file.

anyone know something like this?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM.